subject
English, 23.06.2019 09:30 rikac72791

There may be a mistake in the way the sentence is written. if you find a mistake, choose the answer that corrects the mistake. if there is no mistake, choose ‘correct as is.' a) correct as is. b) people who defy existing laws for money, animal parts, or personal reasons are called poachers. c) people who defy existing laws to kill predators for money, animal parts, or personal reasons are called poachers. d) people who defy existing laws to kill predators for money, animal parts, but personal reasons are called poachers.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 22.06.2019 12:00
Explain the subject-verb agreement rule that applies to a singular collective subject functioning as a single unit. demonstrate your understanding of the rule by composing a sentence that uses the singular collective subject "crew”
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 16:00
In "speech after being convicted of voting" why does susan be anthony include excerpts from the declaration of independence and the constitution to support her argument
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 16:30
Read the passages below and complete the instructions that follow. argument’s conclusion: governments should legally ban restaurants from offering toys as an incentive to families to buy food with high amounts of sugar, fat, or sodium. counterargument: if the government educated parents about the health effects of food with high amounts of sugar, fat, or sodium, then parents would not feed their kids food with high amounts of sugar, fat, or sodium. rebuttal: even if parents have the knowledge they need to make the right decision, it’s difficult to do so if restaurants can use marketing techniques such as popular toys to attract customers. educating parents combined with regulating restaurants can families make healthier decisions. put the counterargument and rebuttal above into paragraph format. add signal words to properly guide the reader.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 16:30
Which sentence best uses transitions to explain how the evidence supports the reason in the accompanying claim statement? clearly, rainsford did not kill zaroff in self-defense. this statement, therefore, shows that rainsford killed zaroff in self-defense. so, rainsford is not justified because there is no proof he acted in self-defense. in the end, rainsford is not justified in killing zaroff.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
There may be a mistake in the way the sentence is written. if you find a mistake, choose the answer...
Questions
question
English, 12.02.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 12.02.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 12.02.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 12.02.2021 01:00
question
History, 12.02.2021 01:00
Questions on the website: 13722363