In an argument about divorce, your opponent argues that divorce should be easier to obtain. which statement would best refute this argument

I would say that if divorces were easy to obtain, there would be more divorces and that wouldn't be so good for our society because strong families and family bonds make a strong community, too. When something is easy to obtain then people won't hesitate to get it. That happens in Holland where drugs for the personal use were allowed. As a consequence there was an increase in social health problems.

a phrase is a set of word that make a sense, an expression formed by two or more words.

" teacher´s dictum on the possession of human "

" made a pile practicing "

" lived to an impressive age and dies "

a clause, in a grammar way is a series of words that have a complete meaning.

" was irritated by the persecution of those who called themselves "

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."