Which is a logical appeal against appearing reality shows? a) reality shows can be quite lucrative for the performers, earning lots of money. b) reality shows have increased rude and aggressive behavior among young people. c) reality shows amount to "free publicity" with the "stars" being given free media attention. d) reality shows can be an effective launching point for a career in news media and entertainment.

If we're arguing against reality shows, we probably want to show that it has some negative effect on others. The only answer choice that directly describes a negative effect of reality shows is B.

Neither choice A nor choice D directly describes a negative effect on any individual. Choice C may sound appealing, but it does not directly state any negative effect on any individual, while choice B says that reality shows make young people less pleasant. Thus, choice B is the best answer.

The only logical appeal AGAINST appearing on reality shows is that reality shows have increased rude and aggressive behavior among young people.

The other choices might be good reasons why someone would want to appear on a reality show. If the performers can get free publicity to potentially launch a career in news media or entertainment and/or can earn a lot of money, who wouldn't want to appear on a reality show.

explanation

old disney was more kid oriented as appose to new disney it's more teen oriented.i guess what i'm trying to say is new disney is way more mature and out there then old disney. for instance all you see in new disney is bf/gf drama and old disney it was nothing like that. kids are growing up and as coorpations like disney, nickolden etc they tend to follow what kids follow so they can have more views . therefore   they have inferred   that now days kids want to have relationships and stuff so that's what disney gives them.

answer: this is easy, i found "it"

i will repeat the question again, "find it."

here, i located it.