Which sentence should be revised for clarity a. the speech about online data mining was entertaining and informative b. the speech that the computer science expert gave regarding online data mining was informative and entertaining c. the speech that computer science expert gave regarding online data miming was filled with information also very entertaining d. the expert in computer science gave an informative and entertaining speech about online data miming

I believe the sentence that should be revised for clarity to be letter c) The speech that computer science expert gave regarding online data mining was filled with information also very entertaining.

Explanation:

The sentence above presents a quite confusing structure when it mentions the qualities of the speech. The speaker means to say the speech offered information and entertainment, but he/she does it in a strange manner: "was filled with information also very entertaining." We can sense there is a conjunction lacking. Besides that, the use of parallel structures - words or phrases that have the same function - would also be beneficial to the sentence.

There are at least a couple of corrections we can use to improve this structure, as you can see in the options below:

read this passage from the crisis. what rationale is paine using for going to war with great britain? my own line of reasoning is to myself as straight and clear as a ray of light. not all the treasures of the world, so far as i believe, could have induced me to support an offensive war, for i think it murder; but if a thief breaks into my house, burns and destroys my property, and kills or threatens to kill me, or those that are in it, and to "bind me in all cases whatsoever" to his absolute will, am i to suffer it? what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king or a common man; my countryman or not my countryman; whether it be done by an individual villain, or an army of them? if we reason to the root of things we shall find no difference; neither can any just cause be assigned why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other.

it is waged war against an army of countrymen

it would lead to independence from britain

it would be an offensive war

it would be a defensive war

ich statement best shows a problem in travels with charley?

one sharp difficulty presented itself. in the intervening twenty-five years my name had become reasonably well known.

this being so, my trip demanded that i leave my name and my identity at home.

i had to go alone and i had to be self-contained, a kind of casual turtle carrying his house on his back.

with all this in mind i wrote to the head office of a great corporation which manufactures trucks.