In the poem "to his coy mistress," marvell uses words such as if, then, therefore, and thus to present a logical argument. show how marvell uses these words to construct the argument.

In "To His Coy Mistress," two arguments run parallel to each other: The speaker uses the carpe diem theme to try to persuade his beloved to indulge in the physical pleasure of love; and beneath the surface of the frivolous subject of courtship, the poet makes a serious point about the fleetingness of human life.

"... I would

Love you ten years before the Flood,

And you should, if you please, refuse

Till the conversion of the Jew"

The speaker makes biblical allusions in the lines above. He refers to the story of the great flood from the book of Genesis and the conversion of the Jews, which, it is said, will occur shortly before the Last judgement. These allusions are meant to convince the speaker's mistress that he would court her at a slower pace if he had more time. But that pace is not possible because life is too short.

"Thy beauty shall no more be found,

Nor, in thy marble vault, shall sound

My echoing song; then worms shall try

That long-preserved virginity"

Here the speaker argues that the chastity his mistress is trying to preserve will be nothing but the food of worms after death. He is trying to persuade her to enjoy carnal pleasure while she is young.

"Now therefore, while the youthful hue

Sits on thy skin like morning dew"

In these lines, the speaker is reinforcing his point that the pleasures of youth are to be enjoyed while still young. The final couplet seals the argument with a concluding thus:

"Thus, though we cannot make out sun

Stand still, yet we will make him run."

In these final lines, the speaker acknowledges that he can't make time stop, but if he and his beloved enjoy the time they have to the fullest, then time will at least have a tough job keeping up with them.

c is the answer : )

explanation:

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this