In which two ways did the spread of enlightenment thought contribute to the french revolution 1 enlightenment ideas made the people increasingly rigid in their values and mindset 2 enlightenment thinkers ideas influenced prominent revolutionaries to act3 enlightenment thoughts introduced people to other forms of government such as popular sovereignty 4 enlightenment concepts urged people to discover creative ways to win government privileges5 enlightenment professors inspired students to cultivate a rebellious and revolutionary

2 and 3 are 2 ways the Enlightenment helped society the french revolution.

Explanation:

1.- This is false because Enlightenment helped society to know the explanation of things that didn’t have an objective explanation. Because they provided information to accept new ways of thought.

2.- It’s true because many revolutionaries understood the abuse they were living in by being prohibited of knowledge by the institutions in power. That let them to look for new systems of power and political administration, in which all people could have access to the same rights and quality of life, as well as the ability to learn and know.

3.- It's true because the thinkers revealed to the general population different ways of political organization.

4.- The enlightenment didn’t point to get privileges over the rest of the population, but to liberate everyone into knowledge and learning to understand the world better and open their eyes to the abuse they were living by been separated from reason, knowledge, and learning.

5.- It's False because not all the thinkers were professors or had students, however they are considered Sources of knowledge, so they can be called professors. Nevertheless, even though they intended to reveal the truth to everyone, they didn't want to create chaos and turmoil. But to provide people with knowledge to help them improve their lives. They wanted to revolution their ideologies and thoughts, not civil war or uprisings against the government.

based on the biblical principle proverbs 16: 32, i agree with the author of the passage "better is it that it takes longer to be angry than the strong " to the extent that i share the philosophy that the nobility of heart demonstrates the strength of a person. those who are very proud, get angry easily and show their anger toward others are really weak, but those who are noble and do not constantly obfuscate or contain their feelings of anger, are strong people