How would the story hamadi by naomi shihab nye be different if handy was its first-person narrator? a.) the reader would know more about what motivates and propels the actions of every character. b.) the reader would know that hamadi actually does not believe many of the things he says to susan. c.) the reader would know more about hamadi’s inner thoughts and feelings and less about susan’s. d.) the reader would get a more impartial and honest account of the stories events.

The answer is option C: The reader would know more about Hamadi’s inner thoughts and feelings and less about Susan’s.

The first person point of view is used to provide readers with the narrator's feelings and inner thoughts. As a consequence, if "Hamadi" had been written in the first person with Hamadi as the narrator, then readers would not have so much information about what motivates the rest of the characters, and the account would be influenced by Hamadi's emotions and prejudices.

the police rob enrique and other migrants and they deport them back

(i can't select because there is no options but, i will answer) using evidence effectively. most of the assignments you will do in university will ask you to make an argument, to take a stance, or to prove a hypothesis. the best way to do this is to research the topic, develop a thesis statement, hypothesis, or claim and then use evidence to support this claim.