**will give brainliest if right** **150 or more words only** **50 points**write an argument for or against the idea of using controlled fires to protect wild areas.

Controlled burns clear brush on the forest floor to make way for saplings to grow.  They also assist in replenishing nutrients to the soil.  Wildfires can be bad in the sense that they can kill animals if they have not relocated.

Well, why? Why are they a good thing? Let’s come up with three reasons—a) they prevent real forest fires by reducing fuel for future fires, b) germination of flowering plants is stimulated, and c) nutrient-rich soil is exposed. Now, if we add our three points to the topic, we’ll have a thesis statement that will serve as a beginning of the body paragraphs because the points will translate into the topics of the body paragraphs. Here is what the thesis statement (your argument) will, thus, look like:

Controlled fires are a good thing because they prevent real forest fires by reducing fuel for future fires, germination of flowering plants is stimulated, and nutrient-rich soil is exposed.

Explanation:

When constructing an argument for anything (either for or against), it is important to first come up with a topic then three points that support the topic by answering “why?” This is what will turn into your thesis. For instance, let’s say you are in favor of controlled fires. Your topic might resemble the following:

Please give me Brainliest for this!

the correct answer is a "it describes nora and mrs. linde's relationship". opcions b and d are not related to the content of the passage in any way. option c could be appropiate but it does not fully capture the effect of the dialogue, while option a is quite appropiate, since the dialogue not only exemplifies the relationship between the characters, but it also captures the effect in the excerpt. we get to know that mrs linde bosses around and already knows nora.

a. beside the fence

explanation: