Write an argument for or against the idea of using controlled fires to protect wild areas.

Found this on past answered questions...seems legit lol.

Personally, I think that using controlled fires to protect wild areas is a bad idea. First of all, I don't think there is a thing as a raging, huge CONTROLLED fire. Just one slip up something could go wrong. I don't think it's worth it. There are other ways to protect wild areas, and burning it down is not one of them. Secondly, it releases a lot of carbon dioxide. That is not good for the atmosphere. We want breathable air, not smoke and carbon dioxide. Lastly, you could kill a lot of wildlife. Burning down the area to save the area will not help. I do not think it is worth it.

to and without are prepositions, so a, b, and d are prepositional phrases. the adverb phrase is c, about the surprise.

explanation: