In the metamorphosis which example most clearly kafka to establish a theme of isolationa. gregors mother decides to fire the cleaning woman after gregor dies. b. the chief clerk is angry that gregor missed the train to work. c.grete stops caring for gregor and decides the family must get rid of him. d. gregor's father gets a job in the bank and becomes more confident.

The correct answer is C. Grete stops caring for Gregor and decides the family must get rid of him.

Explanation:

"The Metamorphosis", which is the most famous literary work by the writer Franz Kafka, tells the story of Gregor Samsa as one day he founds his body has changed and transformed into an insect which represents multiple challenges and changes in the life of the main character. Because of this, in this novel, Kafka explores certain themes (message the author wants to convey to the audience) such as alienation and isolation mainly through the actions of Gregor and the people that surround him.

In the case of isolation, Kafka uses the relationship between the main character and his family to depict this theme as before the transformation of Gregor and he provided to the family they treated in a different way, but once he is an insect and cannot communicate with them the family begins despising Gregor and even his sister Grete who help him to feel better with the transformation believes he is a burden and isolate him. Thus, an example of the way in which Kafka establishes a theme of isolation is that "Grete stops caring for Gregor and decides the family must get rid of him" as the actions of the characters show to the reader the way the character was left alone as it became a burden and was not a provider for the family anymore, which sends a message to the audience (theme) about isolation.

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

um, what am i suppose to answer here? it just said that he will studied hared because of a grade in spanish.