Claim #1: david likes peanut butter. claim #2: some people who like peanut butter are mean. conclusion: david is a meanie. which best identifies an error in the relevance of this argument? a: the writer is stereotyping david just because he likes peanut butter. b: a preference for or against peanut butter is not a valid way to evaluate an individual's personality. c: the writer has neglected to include a conclusion that explains why david is a meanie. d: it's possible that david is not among the group of people who like peanut butter and are mean.
Answers: 2
Another question on English
English, 21.06.2019 15:30
Which of the following best states the purpose of an import quota? a. to prevent a budget deficit. b. to reduce competition from foreign producers. c. to increase the gross domestic product. d. to lower taxes and limit government spending
Answers: 2
English, 21.06.2019 21:00
The author most likely uses the word monstrous rather than the word “unpleasant” because it has a more positive connotation than the word “unpleasant.” a more negative connotation than the word “unpleasant.” a more neutral connotation than the word “unpleasant.” almost the same connotation as the word “unpleasant.”
Answers: 1
English, 21.06.2019 21:00
How do you present your educational qualifications in a resume? you must present your list of your educational qualifications in chronological order
Answers: 1
English, 21.06.2019 23:30
Which sentence has a correctly placed participial phrase? a. we read about a pizza on the menu covered in pepperoni. b. covered in pepperoni, we read about a pizza on the menu. c. we, covered in pepperoni, read about a pizza on the menu. d. we read about a pizza covered in pepperoni on the menu.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Claim #1: david likes peanut butter. claim #2: some people who like peanut butter are mean. conc...
Questions
Computers and Technology, 23.09.2019 19:20
Physics, 23.09.2019 19:20
Computers and Technology, 23.09.2019 19:20
