What can you infer about the speaker's feelings toward her father? why doesn't she try to intervene in the conflict between her parents? read the poem "without title" by diane glancy

From the poem, I can infer that the speaker

The speaker does not try to intervene in the conflict between her parents becasue

In this poem, the poet quietly observes as her father adapts to life in the city while foregoing core aspects of his culture that he loves. Her father is a Cherokee Native Indian whose culture treasures animals.

Her father loves hunting but nobody seems to share the same interest with him. Even his wife shouts at him when he brings the hides and horns of the animals.

The gentle manner in which the speaker talks about her father show her love for him.

Native American culture and the precepts of society which requires a child to be obedient, and respectful could be reasons why the child did not interrupt her parent's conflict.

Learn more here:

link

This poem seems to have Glancy´s father, a Cherokee man, as the main character, and Glancy herself as the narrator. She sadly reflects about her father´s struggle to maintain his native American identity while living a westernized existence.

Explanation:

The conflict between her parents seems to be out of the narrator´s hands because she was probably just a child when the conflict described happened.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)