Which of these is most clearly an advantage if synthesizing claims and evidence in a group structure a) it leads to stronger conclusions b) it provides a record of the discussion c) it ensures that all members contribute d) it highlights any inconsistancies

Hello Karategirl2240,

My name is Rendorforestmusic and I am here to help!

Your question states: Which of these is most clearly an advantage if synthesizing claims and evidence in a group structure?

In which you gave us some selective options:

A) it leads to stronger conclusions

B) It provides a record of the discussion

C) It ensures that all members contribute

D) It highlights any inconsistancies

Your ANSWER would be: A) It leads to stronger conclusion.

BRAINLIEST!?!

HOPE THIS HELPS!

Have a great day:)

~Rendorforestmusic

no it who u choose to be. let no one tel u what or who to be;

the examples that saki used to represent satire through situational irony are options two (2) and five (5) inasmuch as the wolf thought that looking for a girl in the bushes could be as easy as hunting little pigs at the park, but it took him so much time to find the girl if it had not been not for a silly mistake. also, bertha would have survived to the wolf's hunt if she had not won those medals for goodness, which at the end they were what got her killed by making noise, so winning medals of goodness was not so good achievement, after all.