Evaluation answers the question: how does the writer say what he says? was what the writer said worthwhile? does the writer get his point across?

Evaluation answers the question:

"Was what the writer said worthwhile?".

Explanation:

If you evaluate something, you determine its importance and relevance. Therefore, evaluation is needed in order to answer the question: "Was what the writer said worthwhile?". In other words, by evaluating what the writer said, you fix its value.

i believe that dan is so anxious because he dose not know what awaits him when he gets there. but i dont know to be honest

anyone who was dealing with communism in soviet union in his time had an ideal picture of equality, freedom, the struggle of the working class for a better future, the success of the aristocracy's overthrow and the emancipation of subjugation.   however, anyone who would go to soviet union to see the functioning of the communist system, would be convinced that it was about sad people, about everyday bad life, about the brutal attitude of communist leaders, about ill obsession to completely exterminate every thought on aristocracy. thus, orwell wanted to show all the absurdity, the brutality of the system, the unbearable rule of suspicious morality, the ignorant people who try to play professionally.

the answers are: b. and e.