An office of a state license bureau has two types of arrivals. Individuals interested in purchasing new plates are characterized to have interarrival times distributed as EXPO(6.8) and service times as TRIA(8.8, 13.7, 15.2); all times are in minutes. Individuals who want to renew or apply for a new driver’s license have inter-arrival times distributed as EXPO(8.7) and service times as TRIA(16.7, 20.5 ,29.2). The office has two lines, one for each customer type. The office has five clerks; one devoted to plates (Mary), two devoted to licenses (Sue and Jean), one who is being considered for cross-training (Kathy) so she can serve both customer types, and the team leader (Neil) who can serve both customer types as well. Neil will serve the customer who has been waiting the longest. Note that when entities from the front of multiple FIFO queues (corresponding to multiple Process modules) try to seize the same Resource, the logic to select which entity "wins" is as though all the queues were merged together into a single FIFO queue. Note that, since (for instance) Neil is multi-talented, you’d want to assign someone else to the next customer if you have a choice of which employee to assign. Run your Arena Model and observe the system or cycle time for both customer types over an 8-hour day.

My mom and i are moving and we don’t have wifi for the next week, i want to know if using a using a hotspot with unlimited data is better than using regular wifi. i’m considering cost, speed, and data sacrifices.

1. package newton’s method for approximating square roots (case study 3.6) in a function named newton. this function expects the input number as an argument and returns the estimate of its square root. the script should also include a main function that allows the user to compute square roots of inputs until she presses the enter/return key. 2. convert newton’s method for approximating square roots in project 1 to a recursive function named newton. (hint: the estimate of the square root should be passed as a second argument to the function.) 3. elena complains that the recursive newton function in project 2 includes an extra argument for the estimate. the function’s users should not have to provide this value, which is always the same, when they call this function. modify the definition of the function so that it uses a keyword parameter with the appropriate default value for this argument, and call the function without a second argument to demonstrate that it solves this problem. 4. restructure newton’s method (case study 3.6) by decomposing it into three cooperating functions. the newton function can use either the recursive strategy of project 1 or the iterative strategy of case study 3.6. the task of testing for the limit is assigned to a function named limitreached, whereas the task of computing a new approximation is assigned to a function named improveestimate. each function expects the relevant arguments and returns an appropriate value. 5. a list is sorted in ascending order if it is empty or each item except the last one is less than or equal to its successor. define a predicate issorted that expects a list as an argument and returns true if the list is sorted, or returns false otherwise. (hint: for a list of length 2 or greater, loop through the list and compare pairs of items, from left to right, and return false if the first item in a pair is greater.)

The footer area of a web page generally houses which website feature? terms of use web page content business name or title menu headings