A good deal of restraint must be used in revising programming languages. The greatest danger is that the revision process will continually add new features, so that the language grows more and more complex. Compounding the problem is the reluctance, because of existing software, to remove obsolete features.

Write a full class definition for a class named player , and containing the following members: a data member name of type string .a data member score of type int .a member function called setname that accepts a parameter and assigns it to name . the function returns no value.a member function called setscore that accepts a parameter and assigns it to score . the function returns no value.a member function called getname that accepts no parameters and returns the value of name .a member function called getscore that accepts no parameters and returns the value of score .this is what i have, aparently this is wrong: class player{private: string name; int score; public: void player: : setname (string n){name =n; }void player: : setscore (int s){score = s; }string player: : getname (){return name; }int player: : getscore (){return score; }};

Would a ps4 wired controller work on an xbox one

If you embed a word table into powerpoint, what happens when you make edits to the embedded data? a. edits made to embedded data change the data in the source file; however, edits made to the source file will not be reflected in the embedded data. b. edits made to embedded data will change the data in the source file, and edits made to the source file will be reflected in the embedded data. c. edits made to embedded data don't change the data in the source file, nor will edits made to the source file be reflected in the embedded data. d. edits made to embedded data don't change the data in the source file; however, edits made to the source file will be reflected in the embedded data.