subject
Chemistry, 22.02.2022 04:50 meganwintergirl

The 1987 Montreal protocol was the first international agreement to control emissions of harmful chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) to the ozone layer. It was subsequently amended (London 1990, Copenhagen 1992) to respond to the increased urgency created by the antarctic ozone hole. In this problem we compare the effectiveness of the original and amended protocols. We focus on CFC-12, which has an atmospheric lifetime of 100 years against loss by photolysis in the stratosphere. We start our analysis in 1989 when the Montreal protocol entered into force. In 1989 the mass of CFC-12 in the atmosphere was m = 1 × 1010 kg and the emission rate was E = 4 × 108 kg yr-1. (a) The initial Montreal protocol called for a 50% reduction of CFC emissions by 1999 and a stabilization of emissions henceforth. Consider a future scenario where CFC-12 emissions are held constant at 50% of 1989 values. Show that the mass of CFC-12 in the atmosphere would eventually approach a steady-state value m = 2 × 1010 kg, higher than the 1989 value. Explain briefly why the CFC-12 abundance would increase even though its emission decreases.
(b) The subsequent amendments to the Montreal protocol banned CFC production
completely as of 1996. Consider a scenario where CFC-12 emissions are held constant from 1989 to 1996 and then drop to zero as of 1996. Calculate the masses of CFC-12 in the atmosphere in years 2050 and 2100. Compare to the 1989 value.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Chemistry

question
Chemistry, 21.06.2019 19:00
State the formula for density in words and mathematical symbols
Answers: 2
question
Chemistry, 21.06.2019 21:00
The earth's moon is unusually large. two popular theories of the moon's origin include the "sister world" hypothesis, which states that the moon formed from the same materials as the earth, near enough to the earth that they fell into orbit around each other. a second theory is the "capture" hypothesis, in which the moon formed elsewhere in the solar system, and the earth's gravity pulled it into its orbit. studies of what the moon is made of indicate that some of its materials had to come from the earth or from the same area of the solar system where the earth had formed. at the same time, the moon does not contain much of the material that makes up the earth's core, so the moon could not have formed from the same materials as the earth. how do the two facts above affect the described theories of the moon's origin? a. they show that scientists will never agree on where the moon came from. b. they show that more experiments on moon formation need to be done. c. they show that no theory accounts for the existence of the moon. d. they show that neither theory is complete and entirely correct.
Answers: 1
question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 13:00
Which of the following are good traits of a hypothesis? it will be able to be testedit can predict an outcomeit will explain the observationsall of these
Answers: 2
question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 16:10
Predict the reactants of this chemical reaction. that is, fill in the left side of the chemical equation. be sure the equation you submit is balanced. (you can edit both sides of the equation to balance it, if you need to.) note: you are writing the molecular, and not the net ionic equation. > cacl2(aq) + h20(l)
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The 1987 Montreal protocol was the first international agreement to control emissions of harmful chl...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 04.07.2019 09:40
Questions on the website: 13722367