A curved lined graph is shown. The y axis of the graph has the title Potential Energy. The x axis of the graph has the title Reaction Pathway. The graph curve begins at a higher level and ends at a slightly lower level. A vertical line labeled A, starting from the x axis till the beginning of the graph line is shown. A vertical line labeled B, starting from the x axis till the uppermost hump in the graph curve is shown. Another vertical line labeled C is shown from starting from the x axis till the point where the graph curve ends. Part 1: Does the diagram illustrate an endothermic or an exothermic reaction? Give reasons in support of your answer. Part 2: Describe how you can determine the total change in enthalpy and activation energy from the diagram and if each is positive or negative.

1. the question asks the most appropriate, which seems to rule out "all of the above." your choice appears to be the correct one.

2. the protocol described is good for identifying correlation, but not cause and effect. for cause/effect, you need to devise a protocol that will assign the treatment (or not) to groups that have essentially the same "demographics" with respect to all the other variables. your choice regarding control group seems appropriate. random assignment of treatment (choice d) may be appropriate also. (i think you can argue that b and d are just different descriptions of the same method.)

3. d will randomize the birds, but may not guarantee there are 10 in each group. e will do both, so seems the better choice.

comment on question 2

based on the problem statement, it seems clear that confident, attentive drivers are more likely to use daytime running lights. so, the protocol might need to be devised in such a way that the lights would be turned on or off without the driver's knowledge. (an attentive driver will figure it out.) assigning a confident, attentive driver to a group required to drive without running lights might mess with his/her confidence and attentiveness. you don't want your experiment to do that. (nor do you want the experiment to subject a driver to greater risk of accident as a consequence of driving without running lights.) experiments involving human safety are always problematic.

56 moles of   lieter in chemistry

i dont know the answe

може ли да зареждате повече информация, моля