A runner eats a snack with 375 Calories of nutritional energy. After her snack, she burns 3.16 x 10^6 joules while running

The complete question is given below

A runner eats a snack with 375 Calories of nutritional energy. After her snack, she uses  3.16 X 106 joules while running [1 Calorie = 4184 joules).

Which of the following statements are true? Select all that apply.

A. There were 1.57 X 106 joules of energy in the snack.

B. There were 3.14 X 106 joules of energy in the snack.

C. During her run, she used 755 Calories of energy.

D. During her run, she used 189 Calories of energy.

E. The runner used more Calories while running than she consumed during her snack.

F The runner used fewer Calories while running than she consumed during her snack.

Options A, C and E are all correct options

Explanation:

From the question,

1 calorie = 4184 Joules

therefore 375 calories from the consumed snack

              = (4184 x 375) J

              = 1,569,000J

              = 1.56 x 10⁶ J (option A is correct)

While running, she expends 3.16 x 10⁶ J. We can convert this to calories to see how much calories she expended while running

Recall  4184 Joules = 1 calorie

therefore, 3.16 x 10⁶ Joules is equivalent to

                                 = (3.16 x10⁶/ 4184) calories

                                 = 755.6 calories (option C is also correct)

If she consumes 375 calories from her snack but expended 755 calories during her running exercise, therefore the runner consumed fewer calories than what she expended during her exercise, hence option E is also correct  

Options A, C and E are all correct options

when—without warning—something provokes your anger, you may struggle not to succumb to it. since what typically makes you mad is feeling powerless in the face of what seems unfair, your anger is mostly an attempt at a “quick fix” to right the balance. it’s as though you’re raising a fist in protest, proclaiming that you’re not going to capitulate to such injustice.

there are, however, a multitude of problems related to this immediate, push-back reaction of anger. and probably the key one is that almost never does it resolve the issue that gave rise to it. such reactive anger is probably best understood as self-defeating. as david burns, the author of the seminal self- book feeling good, observes: if realistically, acting on your anger is to make any sense, it needs to meet two criteria—which, in almost every case, is frankly impossible. that is, your anger must:

be directed toward a person who has intentionally (and needlessly) behaved in a hurtful way toward you; and

be beneficial or advantageous to you (i.e., assist you in achieving a desired goal).

i think you’ll agree that only rarely can you claim that your anger is both warranted and , whether to yourself or the relationship.

so let me offer you a two-step alternative to abandoning your better judgment and giving in to the temptation of anger—one that should neutralize your anger in seconds. or, when you’re really angry, in minutes.

but keep in mind that you must really want to execute these steps, be sufficiently motivated to perform them. which means overcoming more unconscious resistance than you might ever have imagined. because there are many immediate “advantages” of anger that can interfere with your resolve, i’ll suggest a few of them that might interfere with your employing this powerful method to rid yourself of counter-productive anger.

explanation:

here's the link to your question!

explanation: