Check the statement(s) that is(are) true. Check All That Apply An excited atom can return to its ground state by absorbing electromagnetic radiation. An excited atom can return to its ground state by absorbing electromagnetic radiation. The energy of an atom is increased when electromagnetic radiation is emitted from it. The energy of an atom is increased when electromagnetic radiation is emitted from it. The energy of electromagnetic radiation increases as its frequency increases. The energy of electromagnetic radiation increases as its frequency increases. Niels Bohr quantized electromagnetic radiation. Niels Bohr quantized electromagnetic radiation. Red light is more energetic than blue light. Red light is more energetic than blue light. The frequency and wavelength of electromagnetic radiation are inversely proportional. The frequency and wavelength of electromagnetic radiation are inversely proportional.

The energy of electromagnetic radiation increases as its frequency increases.

The frequency and wavelength of electromagnetic radiation are inversely proportional.

Explanation:

According to Max Plank's equation, the energy of electromagnetic radiation is given by E=hf where h= Plank's constant and f= frequency of the electromagnetic radiation. This means that the energy and frequency of electromagnetic radiation and its energy are related by a direct proportion. As frequency of the electromagnetic radiation increases, the energy of the radiation increases also.

However, frequency and wavelength of electromagnetic radiation are inversely related. The frequency decreases with increasing wavelength of electromagnetic radiation.

when—without warning—something provokes your anger, you may struggle not to succumb to it. since what typically makes you mad is feeling powerless in the face of what seems unfair, your anger is mostly an attempt at a “quick fix” to right the balance. it’s as though you’re raising a fist in protest, proclaiming that you’re not going to capitulate to such injustice.

there are, however, a multitude of problems related to this immediate, push-back reaction of anger. and probably the key one is that almost never does it resolve the issue that gave rise to it. such reactive anger is probably best understood as self-defeating. as david burns, the author of the seminal self- book feeling good, observes: if realistically, acting on your anger is to make any sense, it needs to meet two criteria—which, in almost every case, is frankly impossible. that is, your anger must:

be directed toward a person who has intentionally (and needlessly) behaved in a hurtful way toward you; and

be beneficial or advantageous to you (i.e., assist you in achieving a desired goal).

i think you’ll agree that only rarely can you claim that your anger is both warranted and , whether to yourself or the relationship.

so let me offer you a two-step alternative to abandoning your better judgment and giving in to the temptation of anger—one that should neutralize your anger in seconds. or, when you’re really angry, in minutes.

but keep in mind that you must really want to execute these steps, be sufficiently motivated to perform them. which means overcoming more unconscious resistance than you might ever have imagined. because there are many immediate “advantages” of anger that can interfere with your resolve, i’ll suggest a few of them that might interfere with your employing this powerful method to rid yourself of counter-productive anger.

explanation:

well in order to answer this question you have to provide more information < 3