subject
Chemistry, 21.04.2020 20:20 erbnichole

The table shows the relationship between the masses of two objects, the distance between the two objects, and the gravitational force between the objects. A 4-column table with 5 rows. The first column labeled Mass of Object 1 (kilograms) has entries 1, 2, 2, 3, 9. The second column labeled Mass of Object 2 (kilograms) has entries 1, 1, 2, 3, 3. The third column labeled Distance between Objects 1 and 2 (meters) has entries 1, 1, 2, 1, 3. The fourth column labeled Gravitational Force Objects 1 and 2 (Newtons) has entries 1 G, 2 G, 1 G, 9 G, 3G. Which conclusion is supported by the data in the table? An increase in the mass of an object causes the same decrease in the gravitational force. An increase in the distance between the objects causes the same decrease in the gravitational force. An increase in the distance between the objects causes a greater change in the gravitational force than the same increase in mass. An increase in the mass causes a greater change in the gravitational force than the same increase in the distance between the objects.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Chemistry

question
Chemistry, 21.06.2019 12:50
Assume that the variables x and y are inversely related. if k = 18, what is the value of y for each of the following points? be sure and record your data to be used in the following problem.
Answers: 2
question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 01:40
Darla claims that the first periodic table developed by mendeleev was not completely accurate, so it is not useful at all. harmony argues that it establish the periodic table we use today, making it more credible. who is correct and why? darla is correct, because a model that has any mistakes should be thrown out. darla is correct, because a good model would not need to change. harmony is correct, because mendeleev’s model had all of the information correct in the first version. harmony is correct, because mendeleev’s model made predictions that came true.
Answers: 1
question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 12:30
Avariable that is not being directly tested during an experiment should be
Answers: 1
question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 14:00
The content of manganese (mn) in steel was determined spectrophotometrically and with the use of the standard addition method. an unknown sample of mn from a digested steel sample gave an absorbance of 0.185 when analyzed spectrophotometrically. when 5.00 ml of solution containing 95.5 ppm mn was added to 50.0 ml of the unknown steel solution (digested sample), the absorbance was 0.248. calculate the concentration, in parts-per-million (ppm), of mn in the digested steel sample solution.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
The table shows the relationship between the masses of two objects, the distance between the two obj...
Questions
question
History, 07.05.2020 04:03
Questions on the website: 13722361