subject
Chemistry, 27.03.2020 17:56 gesic2003

2X+Y2 + X, Y2 A chemist is studying the reaction between the gaseous chemical species X and Y%, represented by the equation above. Initial rates of reaction are measured at various concentrations of reactants. The results are recorded in the following table. Experiment 1 X] 0.15 0.15 0.30 [Y] 0.10 0.20 0.20 Initial Rate of Appearance of X, Y2 (M/s) 32 64 128 3 A second chemist repeated the three experiments and observed that the reaction rates were considerably greater than those measured by the first chemist even though the concentrations of the reactants and the temperature in the laboratory were the same as they were for the first chemist. Which of the following is the best pairing of a claim about a most likely cause for the greater rates measured by the second chemist and a valid justification for that claim? The pressures of the gases used by the second chemist must have been lower than those used by the first A) chemist, thus the collisions between reacting particles were less frequent than they were in the first chemist's experiments. The pressures of the gases used by the second chemist must have been lower than those used by the first chemist, thus the number of collisions with sufficient energy to cause reaction was lower than it was in the first chemist's experiments. The second chemist must have added a catalyst for the reaction, thus providing a different reaction pathway for the reactant particles to react with an activation energy that was lower than that of the uncatalyzed reaction in the first chemist's experiments. The second chemist must have added a catalyst for the reaction, thus providing energy to reactant particles to increase their rate of reaction compared to their rate of reaction in the first chemist's experiments.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Chemistry

question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 00:30
What must happen before a body cell can begin mitotic cell division
Answers: 2
question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 14:00
The content of manganese (mn) in steel was determined spectrophotometrically and with the use of the standard addition method. an unknown sample of mn from a digested steel sample gave an absorbance of 0.185 when analyzed spectrophotometrically. when 5.00 ml of solution containing 95.5 ppm mn was added to 50.0 ml of the unknown steel solution (digested sample), the absorbance was 0.248. calculate the concentration, in parts-per-million (ppm), of mn in the digested steel sample solution.
Answers: 3
question
Chemistry, 23.06.2019 06:50
The student repeated the experiment using a higher concentration of acid. the same volume of acid and the same mass of magnesium ribbon were used. what volume of hydrogen gas would have been produced after 60 seconds?
Answers: 1
question
Chemistry, 23.06.2019 11:00
Find the enthalpy of neutralization of hcl and naoh. 87 cm3 of 1.6 mol dm-3 hydrochloric acid was neutralized by 87 cm3 of 1.6 mol dm-3 naoh. the temperature rose from 298 k to 317.4 k. the specific heat capacity is the same as water, 4.18 j/k g. a. -101.37 kj b. 7055 kj c. 10,1365 kj
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
2X+Y2 + X, Y2 A chemist is studying the reaction between the gaseous chemical species X and Y%, repr...
Questions
question
History, 09.03.2020 23:54
question
Social Studies, 09.03.2020 23:54
question
Mathematics, 09.03.2020 23:54
question
Mathematics, 09.03.2020 23:54
Questions on the website: 13722367