Which experimental evidence supports the idea that the plum pudding model of the atom is not correct?

a few positively charged particles shot into gold foil are deflected by the foil.

some positively charged particles shot into gold foil are attracted to the foil.

most particles shot into gold foil pass straight through the foil.

radioactive particles shot into gold foil cause the gold to become radioactive.

A few positively charged particles shot into gold foil are deflected by the foil.

Explanation:

The Plum Pudding model proposed that the electrons were small particles charged with negative energy and were too small compared with the rest of the atom, and that the positive charged particles in the atom were a solid, if the particles deflected by the foil are deflected that means that the whole nucleus of the particles are smaller in comparission with the whole atom.

both adhesion and cohesion are attractions.

they are different in that adhesion is the force of attraction between the molecules of two different substances, whereas cohesion is the force of attraction between molecules of the same substance.

possible examples include capillary action, in which the adhesion between water and glass causes the water to rise in a narrow tube against the force of gravity.

because of hydrogen bonding, water is extremely cohesive.

this causes molecules on the surface of water to be drawn inward, which is why drops of water form beads on smooth surfaces.

hope this .

the answers would be

the first one and the second one