The zombie apocalypse is here. you have holed up in a biochemistry lab and have only the chemical shelf for food. on the shelf you see: various monosaccharides, and various sugar alcohols (where the carbonyl of the sugar has been converted to an alcohol). would sugars or sugar alcohols give you more energy per carbon? why? (assume all of these will be transported to your cells equally well.)

no, i was listening to water by schoolboy q while and i saw this question

explenation:

water isn't wet. wetness is a description of our experience of water; what happens to us when we come into contact with water in such a way that it impinges on our state of being. we, or our possessions, 'get wet'. a less impinging sense experience of water is that it is cold or warm, while visual experience tells us that it is green or blue or muddy or fast-flowing. we learn by experience that a sensation of wetness is associated with water: 'there must be a leak/i must have sat in something.'

a gas, having a molecular weight of 13 kg/kmol and a kinematic viscosity of 0.25 cm2/s, flows through a pipe 0.25 m internal diameter and 5 km long at the rate of 0.4 m3/s and is delivered at atmospheric pressure.