Researchers are studying possible ways to use the process of nuclear fusion to generate electricity. in what ways would fusion be better than fission for use in power plants?

the fuel used for fusion is abundant in nature and easy to obtain.

fusion occurs at ordinary temperatures and pressures.

the fusion process doesn’t require an energy input.

fusion has fewer safety risks than fission.

fusion doesn’t produce radioactive waste products.

Fusion doesn’t produce radioactive waste products.

Explanation:

The nuclear fission reaction occurs when neutrons are projected to hit heavy elements nuclei such as the ²³⁵₉₂U, the reaction is:

²³⁵₉₂U + ¹₀n → ¹⁴¹₅₆Ba + ⁹²₃₆Kr + 3¹₀n + energy

So, more neutrons (¹₀n) are formed and they will hit the nucleus of the other. The reaction can't be cessed, and always will have radioactive elements in the products.

For a fusion reaction, two nuclei hit and formed a new element, which is not radioactive, and the reaction can be easily cessed:

²₁H + ²₁H→ ₄²He + energy.

The fuel used for fusion is abundant in nature and easy to obtain

Fusion has fewer safety risks than fission.

Fusion doesn’t produce radioactive waste products.

Explanation:

just took test got 100%

the ideal gas law equation is as follows

pv = nrt

where p - pressure

v - volume

n - number of moles

r - universal gas constant

t - temperature

so if the pressure, volume and temperature are already known

we are left with n and r

since r is the universal gas constant that has a known fixed value then r too is known

so we are left with 'n'

once we know temperature volume and pressure

we can find the number of moles of gas present using the ideal gas law equation

this is not my own answer, this is an answer for the same question by the user blahblahmali. i do not claim ownership of this account.