Ammonium nitrate (nh4n03) is one of the most important nitrogen-containing fertilizers. its purity can be analyzed by titrating a solution of nh4no3 with a standard naoh solution. in one experiment a 0.2111-g sample of industrially prepared nh4no3 required 22.62 ml of 0.1023 m naoh for neutralization (a) enter a net ionic equation for the reaction (include states of matter) (b) what is the percent purity of the sample?

The percentage purity of sample is 87.54 %.

Explanation:

Net ionic equation of any reaction does not include any spectator ions.

Spectator ions are defined as the ions which does not get involved in a chemical equation. They are found on both the sides of the chemical reaction when it is present in ionic form.

The chemical equation for the reaction of ammonium nitrate and sodium hydroxide is given as:

Ionic form of the above equation follows:

As, sodium and nitrate ions are present on both the sides of the reaction. Thus, it will not be present in the net ionic equation and are spectator ions.

The net ionic equation for the above reaction follows:

To calculate the moles of sodium hydroxide, we use the equation:

Molarity of sodium hydroxide = 0.1023 M

Volume of sodium hydroxide = 22.62 mL = 0.02262 L   (Conversion factor: 1 L = 1000 mL)

Putting values in above equation, we get:

For the given chemical equation:

By Stoichiometry of the reaction:

1 mole of sodium hydroxide reacts with 1 mole of ammonium nitrate.

So, 0.00231 moles of sodium hydroxide will react with = of ammonium nitrate.

Moles of ammonium nitrate = 0.00231 mol

Molar mass of ammonium nitrate = 80 g/mol

Putting values in above equation, we get:

Mass of pure sample = 0.1848 g

Mass of given sample = 0.2111 g

Putting values in above equation, we get:

Hence, the percentage purity of sample is 87.54 %.

when—without warning—something provokes your anger, you may struggle not to succumb to it. since what typically makes you mad is feeling powerless in the face of what seems unfair, your anger is mostly an attempt at a “quick fix” to right the balance. it’s as though you’re raising a fist in protest, proclaiming that you’re not going to capitulate to such injustice.

there are, however, a multitude of problems related to this immediate, push-back reaction of anger. and probably the key one is that almost never does it resolve the issue that gave rise to it. such reactive anger is probably best understood as self-defeating. as david burns, the author of the seminal self- book feeling good, observes: if realistically, acting on your anger is to make any sense, it needs to meet two criteria—which, in almost every case, is frankly impossible. that is, your anger must:

be directed toward a person who has intentionally (and needlessly) behaved in a hurtful way toward you; and

be beneficial or advantageous to you (i.e., assist you in achieving a desired goal).

i think you’ll agree that only rarely can you claim that your anger is both warranted and , whether to yourself or the relationship.

so let me offer you a two-step alternative to abandoning your better judgment and giving in to the temptation of anger—one that should neutralize your anger in seconds. or, when you’re really angry, in minutes.

but keep in mind that you must really want to execute these steps, be sufficiently motivated to perform them. which means overcoming more unconscious resistance than you might ever have imagined. because there are many immediate “advantages” of anger that can interfere with your resolve, i’ll suggest a few of them that might interfere with your employing this powerful method to rid yourself of counter-productive anger.

explanation:

the answer would be a