A journalist who worked for a business magazine learns about the confidential takeover of a company he is writing about while performing his work duties. As a result, he buys a large amount of stock in the company, but then learns that the takeover will not take place and subsequently sells the stock position and ultimately breaks even on the transactions. In this situation:. A) the journalist may have committed a violation under the misappropriation theory
B) a violation of insider trading rules did not occur because the journalist is not considered an insider of the target company
C) a violation of insider trading did not occur because the journalist did not profit on the transaction
D) a violation of insider trading rules may have occurred because the journalist is considered an insider of the company due to his access to company confidential information

Afirm that makes electronic circuits has been ordering a certain raw material 250 ounces at a time. the firm estimates that carrying cost is i = 30% per year, and that ordering cost is about $20 per order. the current price of the ingredient is $200 per ounce. the assumptions of the basic eoq model are thought to apply. for what value of annual demand is their action optimal?

Alandowner entered into a written agreement with a real estate broker whereby the broker would receive a commission of 10% of the sale price if he procured a "ready, willing, and able buyer" for the landowner's property and if the sale actually proceeded through closing. the broker found a buyer who agreed in writing to buy the property from the landowner for $100,000, the landowner's asking price. the buyer put up $6,000 as a down payment. the agreement between the landowner and the buyer contained a liquidated damages clause providing that, if the buyer defaulted by failing to tender the balance due of $94,000 at the closing date, damages would be 10% of the purchase price. the landowner included that clause because she was counting on using the proceeds of the sale for a business venture that would likely net her at least $10,000. the buyer became seriously ill and defaulted. when he recovered, he demanded that the landowner return his $6,000, and the landowner refused. the broker also demanded the $6,000 from the landowner and was refused. the broker and the buyer filed separate suits against the landowner, with the buyer pleading impossibility of performance. the two cases are consolidated into a single case. how should the court rule as to the disposition of the $6,000?

How much does a neurosurgeon can make most in canada? give me answer in candian dollar