Business, 10.12.2021 22:00 janrusk3983

Emmelyn Logan-Baldwin and other owners (Logan-Baldwin) contracted with L. S.M. General Contractors, Inc. (LSM) to conduct renovations on their historic residence. LSM subcontracted with Henry Isaacs Home Remodeling and Repair (Isaacs) to perform the roofing work on the project. Isaacs in turn subcontracted with Hal Brewster Home Improvements (Brewster), to conduct the roofing work on Isaacs' behalf. When Brewster performed work on the roof, he "botched the job" and caused extensive leaking inside the house. LSM and Issacs attempted to correct the problems, but eventually abandoned the project, leaving Logan-Baldwin to hire others to complete the renovations. Logan-Baldwin sued LSM, Isaacs, and Baldwin for breach of contract. Isaacs sought to dismiss Logan-Baldwin's claim against it, arguing no privity of contract existed between themselves and Logan-Baldwin, and therefore Isaacs should not be liable for any damages. 1. The principle that one who is not a direct party to a particular contract normally does not have rights under that contract is known as.
2. LSMhave privity of contract with Logan-Baldwin, while Isaacs_have privity of contract with Logan-Baldwin.
3. An exception to the doctrine of privity of contract arises when a contract is intended to benefit aparty.
4. This case primarily deals with_.
5. is the promisor in this case.
6. is the promisee.
7. is the third party.
8. A third party that is considered an intended beneficiary to a contractsue the promisor for breach of contract.
9. A third party that is considered an incidental beneficiary to a contractsue the promisor for breach of contract.
10. In determining whether a beneficiary is an intended or incidental beneficiary, the presence of one or more of the following factors strongly indicates that the third party is an intended beneficiary to the contract: whether performance is renderedto the third party, if the third party has a right to, and if the third party is.
11. Was Isaacs’ performance directly to Logan-Baldwin?
12. Did Logan-Baldwin have the right to control the details of Isaacs’ performance?
13. Did Logan-Baldwin expressly appear as a beneficiary in the contract?
14. Although a factor to be considered an intended beneficiary under the contract, the name "Logan-Baldwin"expressly appear in the terms of the contract.
15. As a result of performance being rendered directly to Logan-Baldwin, and Logan-Baldwin's right to control the details of performance, Logan-Baldwin will likely be considered anbeneficiary.
16. As an intended beneficiary, Logan-Baldwinsue to enforce the contract.
17. Is it likely that the court would have ruled in favor of Logan-Baldwin?

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 07:50

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 08:10

Exercise 15-7 crawford corporation incurred the following transactions. 1. purchased raw materials on account $53,000. 2. raw materials of $45,200 were requisitioned to the factory. an analysis of the materials requisition slips indicated that $9,400 was classified as indirect materials. 3. factory labor costs incurred were $65,400, of which $50,200 pertained to factory wages payable and $15,200 pertained to employer payroll taxes payable. 4. time tickets indicated that $55,000 was direct labor and $10,400 was indirect labor. 5. manufacturing overhead costs incurred on account were $81,700. 6. depreciation on the company’s office building was $8,100. 7. manufacturing overhead was applied at the rate of 160% of direct labor cost. 8. goods costing $89,400 were completed and transferred to finished goods. 9. finished goods costing $76,000 to manufacture were sold on account for $105,100. journalize the transactions. (credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is entered. do not indent manually.) no. account titles and explanation debit credit (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (to record the sale) (to record the cost of the sale) click if you would like to show work for this question: open show work

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 09:30

Which of these is not a result of regular exercise

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 13:30

What do you recommend adam do to increase production in a business setting that does not seem to value high productivity?

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

Emmelyn Logan-Baldwin and other owners (Logan-Baldwin) contracted with L. S.M. General Contractors,...