subject
Business, 10.09.2021 22:40 lizycacer863

Landwhehr Inc. has been experiencing problem with turnover among employees in a particular department in the company. The work done is largely unskilled, but the company must have the employee remain on the job at least one year to recover hiring and training costs. The personnel manager took a random sample of 25 people who recently quit to see if the age of the worker at the time they applied for the job had any bearing on the length of job tenure. Age at Time of Application: 21 20 34 26 20 32 18 21 31 20 23 22 27 31 30 25 21 26 32 30 21 20 20 29 18

Required:
Summarize this data.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 14:30
Taking commercial paper means the holder acts honestly
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 15:30
In 2015, lori assigned a paid-up whole life insurance policy to an irrevocable life insurance trust (ilit) for the benefit of her three children. the ilit contained a crummey provision for the benefit of each child. at the time of the transfer, the whole life insurance policy was valued at $200,000, and since lori had not made any other taxable gifts during her lifetime, she did not owe any gift tax. lori died in 2016, and the face value of the whole life insurance policy of $2,000,000 was paid to the ilit. regarding this transfer, how much is included in lori’s gross estate at her death?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 16:00
Arnold rossiter is a 40-year-old employee of the barrington company who will retire at age 60 and expects to live to age 75. the firm has promised a retirement income of $20,000 at the end of each year following retirement until death. the firm's pension fund is expected to earn 7 percent annually on its assets and the firm uses 7% to discount pension benefits. what is barrington's annual pension contribution to the nearest dollar for mr. rossiter? (assume certainty and end-of-year cash flows.)
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 17:00
Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Landwhehr Inc. has been experiencing problem with turnover among employees in a particular departmen...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 22.02.2021 20:40
question
Chemistry, 22.02.2021 20:40
Questions on the website: 13722363