Ngân hàng phát hành một thư tín dụng dự phòng tuân thủ UCP600 để đảm bảo cho giao dịch thanh toán theo hình thức "open account" (Ghi sổ). Thời hạn thanh toán theo hình thức ghi sổ được các bên của Hợp đồng thỏa thuận là thanh toán sau 60 ngày kể từ ngày giao hàng lên tàu. Thư tín dụng dự phòng yêu cầu xuất trình: Hối phiếu, bản tường trình về việc vi phạm nghĩa vụ thanh toán do người hưởng lợi ký, hóa đơn thương mại và bản sao vận đơn đã xếp hàng lên tàu. Trong thư tín dụng dự phòng cũng quy định không được xuất trình chứng từ cho đến khi có sự vi phạm nghĩa vụ thanh toán của người mua Ngân hàng phát hành gửi thông báo về việc từ chối thanh toán với nội dung như sau: "Chúng tôi từ chối thanh toán vì có bất hợp lệ trên Vận đơn: Bản sao vận đơn đã được xuất trình chậm hơn 21 ngày kể từ ngày giao hàng, điều này trái với quy định về việc xuất trình chứng từ quy định trong UCP 600 điều 14 (c)". Vậy, từ chối thanh toán trên của Ngân hàng có được chấp nhận không? Giải thích.

Case in point 1.2 suppose you work in the it department of global hotels, a multinational hotel chain. global hotels runs several specialized business support systems, including a guest reservations system that was developed in-house to meet the requirements of a large company with worldwide operations. guests can make one-stop online reservations by visiting global's website, which has links to all major travel industry sites. global hotels just acquired momma's, a regional chain of 20 motels in western canada. momma's uses a vertical reservations package suitable for small- to medium-sized businesses and a generic accounting and finance package. should momma's use global hotels' information systems or continue with its own? in your answer, consider issues such as business profiles, business processes, system interactivity, edi, ecommerce, and the characteristics of both information systems. what additional information would be to you in making a recommendation?

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.

In 1975, mcdonald’s introduced its egg mcmuffin breakfast sandwich, which remains popular and profitable today. this longevity illustrates the idea of: