subject
Business, 22.07.2021 18:50 brennarfa

A producer of fixed proportion goods X and Y (Q = Qx = Qy) has marginal costs and revenues of MC = 10 Q, MRX = 150 - 6 QX, MRy = 30 - 4 Qy. The producer should produce how many units? a. Qx =9, Qy=9
b. Qx = 9, Qy = 7.5
c. Qx = 10, Qy = 10
d. Qx = 9, Qy=0

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 12:10
This exercise illustrates that poor quality can affect schedules and costs. a manufacturing process has 130 customer orders to fill. each order requires one component part that is purchased from a supplier. however, typically, 3% of the components are identified as defective, and the components can be assumed to be independent. (a) if the manufacturer stocks 130 components, what is the probability that the 130 orders can be filled without reordering components? (b) if the manufacturer stocks 132 components, what is the probability that the 130 orders can be filled without reordering components? (c) if the manufacturer stocks 135 components, what is the probability that the 130 orders can be filled without reordering components?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 23.06.2019 15:00
Ronaldo attends an important meeting with his supervisor and a customer. he thought the meeting went well, but ronaldo's supervisor tells him that he displayed negative nonverbal communication towards the customer. ronaldo replays the meeting in his mind. which of ronaldo's actions is his supervisor referring to?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 23.06.2019 15:00
How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 18:30
George kyparisis makes bowling balls in his miami plant. with recent increases in his​ costs, he has a newfound interest in efficiency. george is interested in determining the productivity of his organization. he would like to know if his organization is maintaining the manufacturing average of a​ 3% increase in productivity. he has the following data representing a month from last year and an equivalent month this​ year: last year now cost per input unit units produced 1 comma 2001,200 1 comma 2001,200 labor​ (hours) 300300 275275 ​$1212 per hour resin​ (pounds) 5050 4545 ​$55 per pound capital invested​ ($) 10 comma 00010,000 11 comma 00011,000 22​% per month energy​ (btu) 2 comma 9002,900 2 comma 7502,750 ​$0.600.60 per btu the percent change in productivity for one month last year versus one month this year on a multifactor basis with dollars as the common denominator​ = 3.153.15​% ​(enter your response as a percentage rounded to two decimal​ places).
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
A producer of fixed proportion goods X and Y (Q = Qx = Qy) has marginal costs and revenues of MC = 1...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 23.03.2021 20:30
question
Mathematics, 23.03.2021 20:30
question
Mathematics, 23.03.2021 20:30
question
Mathematics, 23.03.2021 20:30
question
Mathematics, 23.03.2021 20:30
question
Mathematics, 23.03.2021 20:30
question
Biology, 23.03.2021 20:30
Questions on the website: 13722363