Ngân hàng phát hành nhận được bộ chứng từ với một số nội dung như sau: ❖ Invoice phát hành ngày 30. 11. 2007, với số tiền 100.000 USD, ❖ Packing list ký phát ngày 26.12.2007 ❖ B/L1, phát hành ngày 1.12. 2007, ghi chú ngày "clean on board" là 1.12.2007, cảng bốc Hải Phòng, cảng dỡ KOBE, tàu S1, chuyến 100. ❖ B/L2, phát hành ngày 4.12.2007, ghi chú ngày "clean on board" là 3.12.2007, cảng bốc Hải Phòng, cảng dỡ OSAKA, tàu S1, chuyến 100. ❖ Insurance Policy với số tiền 80.000 EUR, được phát hành 5.12.2007 Cho biết: 1. L/C quy định: ❖ Ngày phát hành L/C: 15.11.2007. ❖ Ngày hết hạn hiệu lực của L/C: 31.12.2007 ❖ Trị giá: 100.000 USD ❖ Thời hạn giao hàng cuối cùng: 15.12.2007 ❖ Mua hàng theo điều kiện CIF ❖ L/C dẫn chiếu UCP 600 ❖ Không cho phép giao hàng từng phần 2 Ngày xuất trình chứng từ là 01.01.2008 Yêu cầu: Ngân hàng phát hành có được phép từ chối bộ chứng từ trên không? Nêurõnguyênnhân vì sao?

Uppose the book-printing industry is competitive and begins in a long-run equilibrium. then hi-tech printing company invents a new process that sharply reduces the cost of printing books. suppose hi-tech's patent prevents other firms from using the new technology. which of the following statements are true about what happens in the short run? check all that apply. hi-tech's average-total-cost curve shifts downward. hi-tech's profits increase. the price of books remains the same. hi-tech's marginal-cost curve remains the same.

technology is the application of knowledge and tools to solve problems and perform tasks more efficiently. t/f

Alandlord rented an art studio to an artist. under the terms of the signed, written, two-year lease, the artist agreed to pay the landlord $1,000 per month and to assume responsibility for all necessary repairs. after the first year of the lease, the artist assigned the balance of his lease to a sculptor. the landlord approved the sculptor as a tenant and accepted two rent payments from her, and then the landlord sold the building to an investor. the sculptor had made two payments to the investor when an electrical fire broke out in the studio, injuring the sculptor. the fire was caused by faulty wiring. the landlord was aware that there was a dangerous wiring problem when he leased the property to the artist. but when the landlord discovered how costly repairs would be, he decided it would be more profitable to sell the property than to repair it. the problem was not easily discoverable by anyone other than an expert electrician, and the landlord did not tell the artist, the sculptor, or the investor about the problem. the sculptor sues to recover damages for her injuries. from whom can the sculptor recover?