ABC company manufactures two products in one process. Joint processing costs up to the split-off point total $33,600 a year. The company allocates these costs to the joint products on the basis of their total sales values at the split-off point. Each product may be sold at the split-off point or processed further. Data concerning these products appear below: Product X Product Y Total
Allocated joint processing costs $16,800 $16,800 $33,600
Sales value at split-off point $24,000 $24,000 $48,000
Costs of further processing $15,000 $18,700 $33,700
Sales value after further processing $35,500 $45,100 $80,600

What is the financial advantage (disadvantage) for the company of processing Product X beyond the split-off point?
a. ($3,500)
b. $27,700
c. $20,500
d. $3,700

How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.