subject
Business, 13.07.2021 18:20 bryan334

You have been paying $1000 every month for 6 years to a friend of yours who is extremely lazy to find a job. The annual interest rate is 9%. What is the worth of your money after 6 years with: a) Annual compounding
b) Every-six-months compounding

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 23.06.2019 01:00
Gideon company uses the allowance method of accounting for uncollectible accounts. on may 3, the gideon company wrote off the $2,000 uncollectible account of its customer, a. hopkins. on july 10, gideon received a check for the full amount of $2,000 from hopkins. on july 10, the entry or entries gideon makes to record the recovery of the bad debt is
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 01:30
At the end of the fiscal year, apha airlines has an outstanding non-cancellable purchase commitment for the purchase of 1 million gallons of jet fuel at a price of $4.10 per gallon for delivery during the coming summer. the company prices its inventory at the lower of cost or market. if the market price for jet fuel at the end of the year is $4.50, how would this situation be reflected in the annual financial statements?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 23.06.2019 06:50
Jaden has a degree in marketing. she would like to run her department. she is going back to school to get a degree in: a. web designer b. database administrator c. information security d. computer user support
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 15:00
How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
You have been paying $1000 every month for 6 years to a friend of yours who is extremely lazy to fin...
Questions
question
History, 18.10.2020 15:01
question
Computers and Technology, 18.10.2020 15:01
question
Mathematics, 18.10.2020 15:01
Questions on the website: 13722363