Business, 02.07.2021 20:20 habsofarah0

2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 Sales $ 282,880 $ 270,800 $ 252,600 $ 234,560 $ 150,000 Cost of goods sold 128,200 122,080 115,280 106,440 67,000 Accounts receivable 18,100 17,300 16,400 15,200 9,000 Compute trend percents for the above accounts, using 2015 as the base year.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: 4presidents

Sales

2019 Net Sales = 188.59%

2018 Net Sales = 180.53%

2017 Net Sales = 168.4%

2016 Net Sales = 156.37%

Cost of Goods Sold

2019Cost of Goods Sold = 191.34%

2018 Cost of Goods Sold = 182.21%

2017 Cost of Goods Sold = 172.06%

2016 Cost of Goods Sold = 158.87%

Accounts Receivable:

2019 Accounts Receivable = 201.11%

2018Accounts Receivable = 192.22%

2017Accounts Receivable = 182.22%

2016Accounts Receivable = 168.89%

Explanation:

Computation forn trend percents for the above accounts, using 2015 as the base year:

FOR SALES:

2019:

Net Sales = Sales 2019 / Sales 2015*100

Net Sales = $282,880 / $150,000 * 100

Net Sales = 188.59%

2018:

Net Sales = Sales 2018 / Sales 2015*100

Net Sales = $270,800 / $150,000 * 100

Net Sales = 180.53%

2017:

Net Sales = Sales 2017 / Sales 2015*100

Net Sales = $252,600 / $150,000 * 100

Net Sales = 168.4%

2016:

Net Sales = Sales 2016 / Sales 2015*100

Net Sales = $234,560 / $150,000 * 100

Net Sales = 156.37%

COST OF GOODS SOLD:

2019:

Cost of Goods Sold = Cost of Goods Sold 2019 / Cost of Goods Sold 2015 *100

Cost of Goods Sold = $128,200 / $67,000 * 100

Cost of Goods Sold = 191.34%

2018:

Cost of Goods Sold = Cost of Goods Sold 2018 / Cost of Goods Sold 2015 *100

Cost of Goods Sold = $122,080 / $67,000 * 100

Cost of Goods Sold = 182.21%

2017:

Cost of Goods Sold = Cost of Goods Sold 2017 / Cost of Goods Sold 2015 *100

Cost of Goods Sold = $115,280 / $67,000 * 100

Cost of Goods Sold = 172.06%

2016:

Cost of Goods Sold = Cost of Goods Sold 2016 / Cost of Goods Sold 2015 *100

Cost of Goods Sold = $106,440 / $67,000 * 100

Cost of Goods Sold = 158.87%

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE:

2019:

Accounts Receivable = Accounts Receivable 2019 / Accounts Receivable 2015 * 100

Accounts Receivable = $18,100 / $9,000 * 100

Accounts Receivable = 201.11%

2018:

Accounts Receivable = Accounts Receivable 2018 / Accounts Receivable 2015 * 100

Accounts Receivable = $17,300 / $9,000 * 100

Accounts Receivable = 192.22%

2017:

Accounts Receivable = Accounts Receivable 2017 / Accounts Receivable 2015 * 100

Accounts Receivable = $16,400 / $9,000 * 100

Accounts Receivable = 182.22%

2016:

Accounts Receivable = Accounts Receivable 2016 / Accounts Receivable 2015 * 100

Accounts Receivable = $15,200 / $9,000 * 100

Accounts Receivable = 168.89%

Answer from: Quest

answer; coefficient of correlation;

Answer from: Quest

answer; blank(1); /// whitelisting; blank(2); // blacklisting;

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 01:00

Who is better at multi-tasking? in business, employees are often asked to perform a complex task when their atten-tion is divided (i.e., multi-tasking). human factors (may 2014) published a study designed to determine whether video game players are better than nonâ€“video game play-ers at multi-tasking. each in a sample of 60 college stu-dents was classified as a video game player or a non-player. participants entered a street crossing simulator and were asked to cross a busy street at an unsigned intersec-tion. the simulator was designed to have cars traveling at various high rates of speed in both directions. during the crossing, the students also performed a memory task as a distraction. two variables were measured for each student: (1) a street crossing performance score (measured out of 100 points) and (2) a memory task score (measured out of 20 points). the researchers found no differences in either the street crossing performance or memory task score of video game players and non-gamers. â€śthese results,â€ť say the researchers, â€śsuggest that action video game players [and non-gamers] are equally susceptible to the costs of dividing attention in a complex taskâ€ť

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 20:30

This problem has been solved! see the answercompute and interpret altman's z-scoresfollowing is selected financial information for ebay, for its fiscal years 2005 and 2006.(in millions, except per share data) 2006 2005current assets $ 4,970.59 $ 3,183.24current liabilities 2,518.39 1,484.93total assets 13,494.01 11,788.99total liabilities 2,589.38 1,741.00shares outstanding 1,368.51 1,404.18retained earnings 4,538.35 2,819.64stock price per share 30.07 43.22sales 5,969.74 4,552.40earnings before interest and taxes 1,439.77 1,445.18compute and interpret altman z-scores for the company for both years. (do not round until your final answer; then round your answers to two decimal places.)2006 z-score = answer2005 z-score = answerwhich of the following best describes the company's likelihood to go bankrupt given the z-score in 2006 compared to 2007.the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. both z-scores are well above the score that represents a healthy company.the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly increased the risk of bankruptcy.the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. the z-score has decreased sharply, which suggests the company is in financial distress.the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly lowered the risk of bankruptcy.

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 21:10

The blumer company entered into the following transactions during 2012: 1. the company was started with $22,000 of common stock issued to investors for cash. 2. on july 1, the company purchased land that cost $15,500 cash. 3. there were $700 of supplies purchased on account. 4. sales on account amounted to $9,500. 5. cash collections of receivables were $5,500. 6. on october 1, 2012, the company paid $3,600 in advance for a 12-month insurance policy that became effective on october 1. 7. supplies on hand as of december 31, 2010 amounted to $225. the amount of cash flow from investing activities would be:

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 21:30

An allergy products superstore buys 6000 of their most popular model of air filters each year. the price of the air filters is $18. the cost of ordering and receiving shipments is $12 per order. accounting estimates annual carrying costs are 20% of the price. the supplier lead time is 2 days. the store operates 240 days per year. each order is received from the supplier in a single delivery. there are no quantity discounts. what is the store’s minimum total annual cost of placing orders & carrying inventory?

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 Sales $ 282,880 $ 270,800 $ 252,600 $ 234,560 $ 150,000 Cost of goods sold...

Questions