Business, 07.05.2021 22:50 6lost6soul6

Suppose that Boeing and Rolls-Royce Holdings are the sole producers of a particular jet engine. The two firms currently charge the same price for their products. If neither firm reduces the price of its engine, each firm earns $36 million in profit. If both firms reduce their prices, then each firm will earn $10 million in profit. If one firm reduces its price and the other does not, then the firm that reduces price will earn a profit of $50 million while the other firm will earn a profit of $5 million. 1/ If the firms can operate as a cartel, then
A/each firm will reduce its pric
B/ each firm will maintain its current price.
C/ Boeing will reduce its price and Rolls-Royce Holdings will maintain its current price
D/ Rolls-Royce Holdings will reduce its price and Boeing will maintain its current price
2/ Assuming that collusion is not a possibility, the Nash equilibrium occurs when
A. each firm reduces its price.
B. each firm maintains its current price.
C. Rolls-Royce Holdings reduces its price and Boeing maintains its current price.
D. Boeing reduces its price and Rolls-Royce Holdings maintains its current price.
BB/ Suppose there are two breakfast restaurants in your college town, Waffle Kingdom and Flip’s Flapjacks, and they decide to operate collusively as a cartel. If both restaurants abide by the cartel’s agreement, then each will earn $100,000 in profit. If both restaurants cheat on the cartel’s agreement, then each will earn $25,000 in profit. If one restaurant cheats and the other abides by the agreement, then the cheater will earn a profit of $150,000 while the firm that abides will have a loss of $12,500.
1/ The most profitable combined outcome for the two restaurants would be
a/for both restaurants to abide by the cartel’s agreement.
b/ for both restaurants to cheat on the cartel’s agreement.
c/ for Waffle Kingdom to cheat on the agreement and Flip’s Flapjacks to abide by the agreement.
d/ There is not a profitable outcome for both restaurants.
2/The Nash equilibrium for the two restaurants would be
a/for both restaurant abide by the cartel’s agreement.
b/ for both restaurants cheat on the cartel’s agreement.
c/ for Waffle Kingdom to cheat on the agreement and Flip’s Flapjacks to abide by the agreement.
d/There is no Nash equilibrium for firms Waffle Kingdom and Flip’s Flapjacks.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 08:40

Calculate the cost of each capital component—in other words, the after-tax cost of debt, the cost of preferred stock (including flotation costs), and the cost of equity (ignoring flotation costs). use both the capm method and the dividend growth approach to find the cost of equity.calculate the cost of new stock using the dividend growth approach.what is the cost of new common stock based on the capm? (hint: find the difference between re and rs as determined by the dividend growth approach and then add that difference to the capm value for rs.)assuming that gao will not issue new equity and will continue to use the same target capital structure, what is the company’s wacc? e. suppose gao is evaluating three projects with the following characteristics.each project has a cost of $1 million. they will all be financed using the target mix of long-term debt, preferred stock, and common equity. the cost of the common equity for each project should be based on the beta estimated for the project. all equity will come from reinvested earnings.equity invested in project a would have a beta of 0.5 and an expected return of 9.0%.equity invested in project b would have a beta of 1.0 and an expected return of 10.0%.equity invested in project c would have a beta of 2.0 and an expected return of 11.0%.analyze the company’s situation, and explain why each project should be accepted or rejected g

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 11:20

Lusk corporation produces and sells 14,300 units of product x each month. the selling price of product x is $25 per unit, and variable expenses are $19 per unit. a study has been made concerning whether product x should be discontinued. the study shows that $72,000 of the $102,000 in monthly fixed expenses charged to product x would not be avoidable even if the product was discontinued. if product x is discontinued, the annual financial advantage (disadvantage) for the company of eliminating this product should be:

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 11:30

What would you do as ceo to support the goals of japan airlines during the challenging economics that airlines face?

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 21:00

You have $5,300 to deposit. regency bank offers 6 percent per year compounded monthly (.5 percent per month), while king bank offers 6 percent but will only compounded annually. how much will your investment be worth in 17 years at each bank

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

Suppose that Boeing and Rolls-Royce Holdings are the sole producers of a particular jet engine. The...

Questions