Business, 01.05.2021 22:30 BlehBlah1441

On January 1, Mitzu Co. pays a lump-sum amount of $2,750,000 for land, Building 1, Building 2, and Land Improvements 1. Building 1 has no value and will be demolished. Building 2 will be an office and is appraised at $671,000, with a useful life of 20 years and a $75,000 salvage value. Land Improvements 1 is valued at $579,500 and is expected to last another 19 years with no salvage value. The land is valued at $1,799,500. The company also incurs the following additional costs. Cost to demolish Building 1 $345,000
Cost of additional land grading 195,000
Cost to construct new building (Building 3), having a useful life of 25 years and a $402,000 salvage value 2,242,000
Cost of new land improvement (Land Improvements 2) near Building 2 having a 20-year useful life and no salvage value 173,000
Allocate the costs incurred by Mitzu to the appropriate columns and total each column.
Allocation of Purchase Price Appraised Value Percent of Total x Total Cost of Acquisition = Apportioned Cost
Land $1,952,000 x $2,750,000 =
Building 2 $732,000 x $2,750,000 =
Land Improvements 1 $366,000 12% x $2,750,000 = 330,000
Totals $1,952,000 12% x = 330,000

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 06:50

Suppose the marginal damage and marginal benefit curves in a polluted neighborhood are md = p/3 and mb = 4 – p. also, suppose that transactions costs are low, so that the consumers and the firm can bargain. we saw that in this case, the socially-optimal level of pollution is achieved. start by computing the socially-optimal p. then, for each of the following cases, compute the amount of money transferred through the bargaining process, and indicate who pays whom (i.e., whether consumers pay the firm, or vice versa). also, compute the gains to each party relative to the status quo (i.e., the starting point of the bargaining process).a)consumers have the right to clean air; firm is dominant in the bargaining process.b)consumers have the right to clean air; consumers are dominant in the bargaining process.c)firm has the right to pollute; firm is dominant in the bargaining process.d)firm has the right to pollute; consumers are dominant in the bargaining proces

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 11:10

How much are you willing to pay for a zero that matures in 10 years, has a face value of $1,000 and your required rate of return is 7%? round to the nearest cent. do not include a dollar sign in your answer. (i.e. if your answer is $432.51, then type 432.51 without $ sign)

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 12:30

Sales at a fast-food restaurant average $6,000 per day. the restaurant decided to introduce an advertising campaign to increase daily sales. to determine the effectiveness of the advertising campaign, a sample of 49 days of sales were taken. they found that the average daily sales were $6,300 per day. from past history, the restaurant knew that its population standard deviation is about $1,000. if the level of significance is 0.01, have sales increased as a result of the advertising campaign? multiple choicea)fail to reject the null hypothesis.b)reject the null hypothesis and conclude the mean is higher than $6,000 per day.c)reject the null hypothesis and conclude the mean is lower than $6,000 per day.d)reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean is equal to $6,000 per day.expert answer

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 22:40

Rolston music company is considering the sale of a new sound board used in recording studios. the new board would sell for $27,200, and the company expects to sell 1,570 per year. the company currently sells 2,070 units of its existing model per year. if the new model is introduced, sales of the existing model will fall to 1,890 units per year. the old board retails for $23,100. variable costs are 57 percent of sales, depreciation on the equipment to produce the new board will be $1,520,000 per year, and fixed costs are $1,420,000 per year.if the tax rate is 35 percent, what is the annual ocf for the project?

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

On January 1, Mitzu Co. pays a lump-sum amount of $2,750,000 for land, Building 1, Building 2, and L...

Questions