Business, 13.04.2021 04:20 supasavb99

23) Sarah is trying to decide which one of two job offers she will accept. Several items are presented below: Job Offer A Job Offer B (1) Base salary $ 50,000 $ 50,000 (2) Overtime compensation Comp. time Hourly rate (3) Moving allowance $ 3,000 $ 3,000 (4) Signing bonus $ 2,000 $ 0 (5) Job search costs incurred $ 300 $ 500 Select the items that are irrelevant to Sarah's decision. A. (1), (3), (5) B. (2), (4) C. (1), (3) D. (2), (3), (4)

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: jourdyno

A. (1), (3), (5)

Explanation:

When deciding on whether the items presented in the Job Offer are relevant or irrelevant, Sarah would need to evaluate and compare between the both Offers.

Base Salary

The base salary offered in both the Job Offers are same. Therefore, this item is irrelevant. Since they both are same it won't matter whichever she selects.

Overtime Compensation

This is different in both the Job Offers. Comp. Time is basically where employers give their employees paid time off in lieu of the overtime they have worked. While in the case of hourly rate, the employees receive additional payment for overtime work. Sarah would have to choose which option is more preferred for her whether extra time or additional payment. This item is therefore relevant.

Moving Allowance

This allowance is equal in each job offers. So, she would receive it in any offer she selects. This item is also irrelevant when making decision on the Job Offer.

Signing Bonus

The signing bonus has been offered in only one of the Job Offers for $2,000. Sarah would need to decide if she would need this bonus or could she forgo the same. This item is relevant.

Job Search Cost

This is basically sunk cost which is not recovered. Therefore, it is irrelevant when making the decision for the Job Offer.

Hence, the base salary, moving allowance and job search cost are irrelevant for Sarah when making decision for the Job offer.

Answer from: soccerlyfe6839

its b llolł

Explanation:

Answer from: Quest

there is no possible way mgk stands a chance with the greatest white rapper of all time. eminem killshots had more bars than rap devil and the reason mgk is doing all this is cause he not getting attention anymore til the release of rap devil and the disses he is putting on eminem. now rap devil was more fire than killshot so mgk might won the battle with rap devil but eminem won the war with killshot.

Answer from: Quest

borrow money from the government then pay the government back 5k

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 10:30

Zapper has beginning equity of $257,000, net income of $51,000, dividends of $40,000 and investments by stockholders of $6,000. its ending equity is

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 21:00

Which of the following statements is correct? stockholders should generally be happier than bondholders to have managers invest in risky projects with high potential returns as opposed to safe projects with lower expected returns. potential conflicts between stockholders and bondholders are increased if a firm's bonds are convertible into its common stock. takeovers are most likely to be attempted if the target firm’s stock price is above its intrinsic value. one advantage of operating a business as a corporation is that stockholders can deduct their pro rata share of the taxes the firm pays, thereby eliminating the double taxation investors would face in a partnership.

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 00:00

Which of the following statements is true about an atm card?

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 23.06.2019 11:20

In march 2012, the state of california started requiring that all packaging for food and drink with the additive 4-methylimidazole (4-mi) be clearly labeled with a cancer warning. because of this, both pepsi and coke changed their formula to eliminate 4-mi as an ingredient. if pepsi and coke did not change their formula, holding all else constant, what would have happened to the demand for these goods, assuming pepsi and coke were in a competitive market? a. the demand curve for both pepsi and coke would have shifted to the right, causing the price of both products to decrease and the profits for the companies to fall. b. the demand curve for pepsi and coke would have remained unchanged, but the price of both products would have decreased and the profits for the companies would have fallen. c. the demand curve for pepsi and coke would have decreased, but the prices and profits would not have changed. d. the demand curve for only one of them would change because pepsi and coke are substitutes. e. the demand curve for pepsi and coke would have shifted to the left, causing the price of both products to decrease and the profits for both companies to fall.

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

23) Sarah is trying to decide which one of two job offers she will accept. Several items are present...

Questions