subject
Business, 13.04.2021 01:00 ProAtWork7

Environmental Laws Arrowhead Uranium Company was one of the original uranium mining companies in the Cameron Arizona region of Northern Arizona, operating from 1952 to the mid 1960's at several different mine sites on the Navajo Reservation. The land where the mine sites were located was owned by the United States in trust for the Navajo Nation. The Department of the Interior and the Bureau of Indian Affairs oversaw some aspects of the mining permits and leases for the Nation. Permits were approved by the director of the BIA (an employee of the United States government). All money related to the mining was paid to the United States Treasury for deposit exclusively in Navajo tribal funds. For almost three decades, the Mine Sites remained largely in the same condition as when mining ceased, with open pits and waste piles on the properties. In 1975, Arrowhead was closed and its assets were bought by Lightning Mines. In the 1980s, the Navajo Nation became concerned about possible health impacts of abandoned uranium mines on the Reservation. People were frequenting the pits for recreational purposes, and livestock was watering at the pits. The Navajo Nation leadership discussed their concerns with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). As a result the EPA cleaned up the mine sites.
1. Arrowhead Uranium Company ran mines on the Navajo Reservation that extracted (uranium, natural gas, coal)
2. The land that was potentially contaminated was owned by (Arrowhead, the United States, the Navajo Nation)
3. Lightning Mines (was, was not) involved in the generation of waste.
4. The law that covers allocation of the costs of cleaning up toxic waste is (CERCLA, RCRA, Title VII) also known as the (Superfund, Cleanup Fund, Cleanup Responsibility Act)
5. Under that law, (anyone who benefitted from the activity is, several parties are) responsible for the cost of cleaning up the waste.
6. Responsibility for cleaning up a toxic waste site falls on the person who (generated, collected, eliminated) the waste, any party who (transported the waste to the site, complained about the waste), the party who (owned, cleaned) the site, the party who (operated, closed down) the site, or the (current owner, neighbor) of the site.
7. Arrowhead was the (party that generated the waste, owner of the site when the waste was generated, current owner of the site).
8. The United States was the (party that generated the waste, owner of the site when the waste was generated, current owner of the site).
9. The Navajo Nation was (owner of the site when the waste was generated, party that generated the site, not involved in generating the waste).
10. A party who is responsible for the cleanup is called a (potentially responsible party, toxic waste generator)
11. Of the parties mentioned, (the United States, Arrowhead, the Navajo Nation) is not a potentially responsible party.
12. Arrowhead (no longer exists, still runs the mines) but was bought by (Lightning Mines, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Bureau of Indian Affairs).
13. If the potentially responsible parties do not clean up a hazardous site, the (EPA, current owner, Bureau of Indian Affairs) can clean it up and recover costs from the (potentially responsible parties, Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Indian Affairs).
14. Liability for cleanup extends to a business that (buys enters in to a contract with) a potentially responsible party.
15. Any potentially responsible party is responsible for (the entire, their percentage share of the) cost of cleanup under the doctrine of
(joint and several liability, res judicata).
16. If a potentially responsible party pays for the entire cost of cleanup, that party (can, cannot) bring a contribution action for a percentage of the costs.
17. In this situation the cost of cleanup must be paid by (the United States only, the United States and the Navajo Nation, the United States and Lightning Mines, Lightning Mines only)

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 05:10
The total value of your portfolio is $10,000: $3,000 of it is invested in stock a and the remainder invested in stock b. stock a has a beta of 0.8; stock b has a beta of 1.2. the risk premium on the market portfolio is 8%; the risk-free rate is 2%. additional information on stocks a and b is provided below. return in each state state probability of state stock a stock b excellent 15% 15% 5% normal 50% 9% 7% poor 35% -15% 10% what are each stock’s expected return and the standard deviation? what are the expected return and the standard deviation of your portfolio? what is the beta of your portfolio? using capm, what is the expected return on the portfolio? given your answer above, would you buy, sell, or hold the portfolio?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:10
The prebisch–singer hypothesis concludes that: a. technology lowers the cost of manufactured products, so developing countries should see an increase in their terms of trade. b. developing countries experience a long-run decline in their terms of trade, as the demand for primary products in higher-income countries declines relative to their demand for manufactured goods. c. because of unfair trading practices, labor in developing countries is exploited. d. opec has been responsible for a slowdown in the world's standard of living.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 12:50
Required information problem 15-1a production costs computed and recorded; reports prepared lo c2, p1, p2, p3, p4 [the following information applies to the questions displayed below. marcelino co.'s march 31 inventory of raw materials is $84,000. raw materials purchases in april are $540,000, and factory payroll cost in april is $364,000. overhead costs incurred in april are: indirect materials, $59,000; indirect labor, $26,000; factory rent, $38,000; factory utilities, $19,000; and factory equipment depreciation, $58,000. the predetermined overhead rate is 50% of direct labor cost. job 306 is sold for $670,000 cash in april. costs of the three jobs worked on in april follow. job 306 job 307 job 308 balances on march 31 direct materials $30,000 $36,000 direct labor 25,000 14,000 applied overhead 12,500 7,000 costs during april direct materials 133,000 210,000 $100,000 direct labor 105,000 150,000 101,000 applied overhead ? ? ? status on april 30 finished (sold) finished in process (unsold) required: 1. determine the total of each production cost incurred for april (direct labor, direct materials, and applied overhead), and the total cost assigned to each job (including the balances from march 31). a-materials purchases (on credit). b-direct materials used in production. c-direct labor paid and assigned to work in process inventory. d-indirect labor paid and assigned to factory overhead. e-overhead costs applied to work in process inventory. f-actual overhead costs incurred, including indirect materials. (factory rent and utilities are paid in cash.) g-transfer of jobs 306 and 307 to finished goods inventory. h-cost of goods sold for job 306. i-revenue from the sale of job 306. j-assignment of any underapplied or overapplied overhead to the cost of goods sold account. (the amount is not material.) 2. prepare journal entries for the month of april to record the above transactions. 3. prepare a schedule of cost of goods manufactured. 4.1 compute gross profit for april. 4.2 show how to present the inventories on the april 30 balance sheet.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 17:30
Communication comes in various forms. which of the following is considered an old form of communication? a) e-mail b) letter c) skype d) texting
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Environmental Laws Arrowhead Uranium Company was one of the original uranium mining companies in th...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 08.10.2021 21:00
question
Mathematics, 08.10.2021 21:00
question
Mathematics, 08.10.2021 21:00
question
Mathematics, 08.10.2021 21:00
Questions on the website: 13722362