Waterways is considering the replacement of an antiquated machine that has been slowing down production because of breakdowns and added maintenance. The operations manager estimates that this machine still has 2 more years of possible use. The machine produces an average of 60 units per day at a cost of $6.20 per unit, whereas other similar machines are producing twice that much. The units sell for $9.30. Sales are equal to production on these units, and production runs for 260 days each year. The replacement machine would cost $99,820 and have a 2-year life. Required:
Given the information above, what are the consequences of Waterways replacing the machine that is slowing down production because of breakdowns?

Allie and sarah decided that they want to purchase renters insurance for the apartment they share. they made a list of all of the items to be covered by the insurance policy, along with their estimated values. if the items to be covered total more than $3000, the insurance company charges an annual premium of 23% of the total value of the items. if the items to be covered total $3000 or less, the insurance company charges an annual premium of 20% of the total value of the items.

An essential element of being receptive to messages is to have an open mind true or false

How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.