subject
Business, 02.04.2021 04:50 milagritomiracle

Huprey Co. is the defendant in the following legal claims. For each of the following claims, indicate whether Huprey should (a) record a liability, (b) disclose in notes, or (c) have no disclosure. 1. It is probable that Huprey will lose a pending lawsuit. Huprey can reasonably estimate the amount of damages to be paid if it loses the lawsuit. multiple choice 1 Record a liability. No disclosure. Disclose in notes.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 06:30
Selected data for stick’s design are given as of december 31, year 1 and year 2 (rounded to the nearest hundredth). year 2 year 1 net credit sales $25,000 $30,000 cost of goods sold 16,000 18,000 net income 2,000 2,800 cash 5,000 900 accounts receivable 3,000 2,000 inventory 2,000 3,600 current liabilities 6,000 5,000 compute the following: 1. current ratio for year 2 2. acid-test ratio for year 2 3. accounts receivable turnover for year 2 4. average collection period for year 2 5. inventory turnover for year 2
Answers: 2
question
Business, 23.06.2019 00:30
You get your monthly banking statement and notice that the number is lower than expected. you decide that you should create a cash flow statement. why are cash flow statements useful in managing money? what are the steps in creating a statement?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 06:00
If a society decides to produce consumer goods from its available resources, it is answering the economic question
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 15:00
How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Huprey Co. is the defendant in the following legal claims. For each of the following claims, indicat...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 25.02.2020 02:51
Questions on the website: 13722367