John and Jane Doe were married for 20. When they were first married, John, as beneficiary, bought a life insurance policy on Jane. Jane likewise bought a life insurance policy on John. After their youngest child went off to college, John and Jane got a divorce. Both were working professionals, so no spousal support was awarded in the divorce. Immediately after the divorce, John purchased a house in a beautiful neighborhood. He was a little worried that him and his neighbor were in a flood zone. Just to be cautious, John bought property insurance policies, with him as the beneficiary, for his house and his neighbor’s house.

After the divorce, Jane moved to California. Considering the number of wildfires in California, Jane bought fire insurance on her home.

One year later there was a flood and John and his neighbor suffered massive losses on their properties. What would happen when John tried to collect on both property insurance policies?

Two weeks after that, there was a wildfire near Jane's house. The wildfire caused a tree to fall, which broke a water line, that caused Jane’s house to flood. She suffered massive damage to her house. What would happen when Jane tried to collect on her fire insurance policy?

Four weeks later, John died of a heart attack. What would happen when Jane tried to collect the life insurance policy?

About time delivery co. incurred the following costs related to trucks and vans used in operating its delivery service: classify each of the costs as a capital expenditure or a revenue expenditure. 1. changed the oil and greased the joints of all the trucks and vans. 2. changed the radiator fluid on a truck that had been in service for the past four years. 3. installed a hydraulic lift to a van. 4. installed security systems on four of the newer trucks. 5. overhaul the engine on one of the trucks purchased three years ago. 6. rebuilt the transmission on one of the vans that had been driven 40,000 miles. the van was no longer under warranty. 7. removed a two-way radio from one of the trucks and installed a new radio with a greater range of communication. 8. repaired a flat tire on one of the vans. 9. replaced a truck's suspension system with a new suspension system that allows for the delivery of heavier loads. 10. tinted the back and side windows of one of the vans to discourage theft of contents.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.

The demand curve determines equilibrium price in a market. is a graphical representation of the relationship between price and quantity demanded. depicts the relationship between production costs and output. is a graphical representation of the relationship between price and quantity supplied.