Business, 05.03.2021 18:30 ahicks2004

Antonio lives in San Francisco and runs a business that sells boats. In an average year, he receives $722,000 from selling boats. Of this sales revenue, he must pay the manufacturer a wholesale cost of $422,000; he also pays wages and utility bills totaling $268,000. He owns his showroom; if he chooses to rent it out, he will receive $2,000 in rent per year. Assume that the value of this showroom does not depreciate over the year. Also, if Antonio does not operate this boat business, he can work as a paralegal, receive an annual salary of $21,000 with no additional monetary costs, and rent out his showroom at the $2,000 per year rate. No other costs are incurred in running this boat business. Identify each of Carlos's costs in the following table as either an implicit cost or an explicit cost of selling pianos.

a. The rental income Carlos could receive if he chose to rent out his showroom
b. The wages and utility bills that Carlos pays
c. The wholesale cost for the pianos that Carlos pays the manufacturer
d. The salary Carlos could earn if he worked as a paralegal

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 04:30

How does your household gain from specialization and comparative advantage? (what is produced, what is not produced yet paid to a specialist to produce? )

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 11:10

An insurance company estimates the probability of an earthquake in the next year to be 0.0015. the average damage done to a house by an earthquake it estimates to be $90,000. if the company offers earthquake insurance for $150, what is company`s expected value of the policy? hint: think, is it profitable for the insurance company or not? will they gain (positive expected value) or lose (negative expected value)? if the expected value is negative, remember to show "-" sign. no "+" sign needed for the positive expected value

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 18:00

David paid $975,000 for two beachfront lots in coastal south carolina, with the intention of building residential homes on each. two years later, the south carolina legislature passed the beachfront management act, barring any further development of the coast, including david's lots. when david files a complaint to seek compensation for his property, south carolina refuses, pointing to a passage in david's own complaint that states "the beachfront management act [was] properly and validly designed to south carolina's " is south carolina required to compensate david under the takings clause?

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 20:00

After testing its water, a city water department issues a report to the related citizens, noting what chemicals have been identified, their doses, and the estimated risks of exposure at these levels. this report represents a type of

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Antonio lives in San Francisco and runs a business that sells boats. In an average year, he receives...

Questions