Using data spanning 2002-2013 from the ACFE Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse, and made available through the Institute for Fraud Prevention (IFP), the authors examined private company FRF cases in comparison to those at public companies and found several key differences. These included the observation that a stronger antifraud environment in public companies appears to lead public company FRF perpetrators to use perhaps to make the fraud less obvious, rather than other fraud schemes such as fictitious revenues.