Which of the following statements about antidilutive securities and their effect on EPS are true? (Select all that apply.) Check All That Apply Dilutive securities are ignored when calculating both basic and diluted EPS. Dilutive securities are ignored when calculating both basic and diluted EPS. It is not immediately obvious whether the effect of the conversion of a particular convertible security would be dilutive or antidilutive. It is not immediately obvious whether the effect of the conversion of a particular convertible security would be dilutive or antidilutive. If the effect of the conversion or exercise of potential common shares would be to increase EPS, the related securities are referred to as antidilutive securities. If the effect of the conversion or exercise of potential common shares would be to increase EPS, the related securities are referred to as antidilutive securities. To determine whether convertible securities are dilutive, we can compare the "incremental effect" of the conversion (expressed as a fraction) with the EPS fraction before the effect of any convertible security is considered. To determine whether convertible securities are dilutive, we can compare the "incremental effect" of the conversion (expressed as a fraction) with the EPS fraction before the effect of any convertible security is considered.

Social computing forces companies to deal with customers as opposed to

The following selected circumstances relate to pending lawsuits for erismus, inc. erismus’s fiscal year ends on december 31. financial statements are issued in march 2019. erismus prepares its financial statements according to u.s. gaap. required: indicate the amount erismus would record as an asset, liability, or not accrued in the following circumstances. 1. erismus is defending against a lawsuit. erismus's management believes the company has a slightly worse than 50/50 chance of eventually prevailing in court, and that if it loses, the judgment will be $1,000,000. 2. erismus is defending against a lawsuit. erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court. if it loses, management believes that damages could fall anywhere in the range of $2,000,000 to $4,000,000, with any damage in that range equally likely. 3. erismus is defending against a lawsuit. erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court. if it loses, management believes that damages will eventually be $5,000,000, with a present value of $3,500,000. 4. erismus is a plaintiff in a lawsuit. erismus's management believes it is probable that the company eventually will prevail in court, and that if it prevails, the judgment will be $1,000,000. 5. erismus is a plaintiff in a lawsuit. erismus’s management believes it is virtually certain that the company eventually will prevail in court, and that if it prevails, the judgment will be $500,000.

Asmartphone manufacturing company uses social media to achieve different business objectives. match each social media activity of the company to the objective it the company achieve.