Business, 15.02.2021 20:20 krissymonae

For each of the proposals, use the previous graph to determine the new number of research assistants hired. Then compute the after-tax amount paid by employers (that is, the wage paid to workers plus any taxes collected from the employers) and the after-tax amount earned by research assistants (that is, the wage received by workers minus any taxes collected from the workers). Tax Proposal Quantity Hired After-Tax Wage Paid by Employers After-Tax Wage Received by Workers
Levied on Employers Levied on Workers (Number of workers) (Dollars per hour) (Dollars per hour)
(Dollars per hour) (Dollars per hour)
4 0
0 4
2 2

Suppose the government doesn't want to discourage employers from hiring research assistants and, therefore, wants to minimize the share of the tax paid by the employers. Of the three tax proposals, which is best for accomplishing this goal?

a. The proposal in which the entire tax is collected from workers
b. The proposal in which the tax is collected from each side evenly
c. The proposal in which the tax is collected from employers
d. None of the proposals is better than the others

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 21.06.2019 14:30

The government often provides goods that are nonrivalrous and nonexclusive to overcome which market failure

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 21.06.2019 22:00

If a bond is issued at a premium the effective interest rate is most likely

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 07:20

Richardson hired j.c. flood company, a plumbing contractor, to correct a stoppage in the sewer line of her house. the plumbing company's 'snake' device, used to clear the line leading to the main sewer, became caught in the underground line. to release it, the company excavated a portion of the sewer line in richardson's backyard. in the process, the company discovered numerous leaks in a rusty, defective water pipe that ran parallel with the sewer line. to meet public regulations, the water pipe, of a type no longer approved for such service, had to be replaced either then or later, when the yard would have to be excavated again. the plumbing company proceeded to repair the water pipe. though richardson inspected the company's work daily and did not express any objection to the extra work involved in replacing the water pipe, she refused to pay any part of the total bill after the company completed the entire operation. j.c. flood company then sued richardson for the costs of labor and material it had furnished. (c) for what, if anything, should richardson be liable? explain."

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 15:10

You want to have $80,000 in your savings account 11 years from now, and you’re prepared to make equal annual deposits into the account at the end of each year. if the account pays 6.30 percent interest, what amount must you deposit each year? (do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.)

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

For each of the proposals, use the previous graph to determine the new number of research assistants...

Questions