subject
Business, 12.02.2021 05:20 liyahheadhigh

Yumi's grandparents presented her with a gift of $18,000 when she was 12 years old to be used for her college education. Over the next 5 years, until she turned 17, Yumi's parents had invested her money in a tax-free account that had yielded interest at the rate of 4.5%/year compounded monthly. Upon turning 17, Yumi now plans to withdraw her funds in equal annual installments over the next 4 years, starting at age 18. If the college fund is expected to earn interest at the rate of 5%/year, compounded annually, what will be the size of each installment

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 15:30
Thirty years ago daniel bought a plot of land for $50,000 when the cpi was 50. now the cpi is 180 and he sold the land for $180,000. what issue might inflation cause for daniel?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 21.06.2019 21:40
Torino company has 1,300 shares of $50 par value, 6.0% cumulative and nonparticipating preferred stock and 13,000 shares of $10 par value common stock outstanding. the company paid total cash dividends of $3,500 in its first year of operation. the cash dividend that must be paid to preferred stockholders in the second year before any dividend is paid to common stockholders is:
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:30
Read the following scenario and answer the question in 5-10 sentences. you are the owner of a small business that is a defendant in a lawsuit in federal court. you received bad news from your lawyer that the judge did not allow certain documents to be admitted as evidence in court and that the jury reached a $50,000 verdict in favor of the plaintiff. your lawyer tells you that it is within your legal right to hire him to file an appeal with the united states court of appeals. if the appellate court rules in your favor, you may be able to avoid paying part or all of the $50,000. evaluate your lawyer’s suggestion about appealing the decision.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 18:00
David paid $975,000 for two beachfront lots in coastal south carolina, with the intention of building residential homes on each. two years later, the south carolina legislature passed the beachfront management act, barring any further development of the coast, including david's lots. when david files a complaint to seek compensation for his property, south carolina refuses, pointing to a passage in david's own complaint that states "the beachfront management act [was] properly and validly designed to south carolina's " is south carolina required to compensate david under the takings clause?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Yumi's grandparents presented her with a gift of $18,000 when she was 12 years old to be used for he...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722367