Merv Grazinski, driving his Winnebago, put it on cruise control to go make coffee. The Winnebago went off the road, turned over several times, and left Grazinski paralyzed from the waist down. He brings a product liability lawsuit against Winnebago. Which of the following is the best possible defense for Winnebago to use at trial? a. Res ipsa loquitur
b. Contributory negligence
c. Assumption of risk
d. Proximate cause

B). Contributory negligence

Explanation:

From the question we are informed about Merv Grazinski, who is driving his Winnebago, put it on cruise control to go make coffee. The Winnebago went off the road, turned over several times, and left Grazinski paralyzed from the waist down. He brings a product liability lawsuit against Winnebago. In this case, the best possible defense for Winnebago to use at trial Contributory negligence. Contributory negligence can be regarded as failure of plaintiff to have a tangible care for their own safety. Plantiff compensation could be reduced by Contributory negligence if confirmed that the occurrence of incident is likely as a result of their actions

don't kill your self you have people who love and care for you and it would hurt them for a long time if you did  

explanation:

p.s. how much is the inhartige

answerservice script;