At December 31, 2021, Newman Engineering’s liabilities include the following: $16 million of 10% bonds were issued for $16 million on May 31, 1999. The bonds mature on May 31, 2029, but bondholders have the option of calling (demanding payment on) the bonds on May 31, 2022. However, the option to call is not expected to be exercised, given prevailing market conditions.
$20 million of 9% notes are due on May 31, 2022. A debt covenant requires Newman to maintain current assets at least equal to 181% of its current liabilities. On December 31, 2021, Newman is in violation of this covenant. Newman obtained a waiver from National City Bank until June 2022, having convinced the bank that the company’s normal 2 to 1 ratio of current assets to current liabilities will be reestablished during the first half of 2022.
$13 million of 12% bonds were issued for $13 million on August 1, 1989. The bonds mature on July 31, 2022. Sufficient cash is expected to be available to retire the bonds at maturity.

ANSWER:
Debt Classification $ Millions
1. Current Liability 16
2. Current Liability 20
3. Current Liability 13

You are welcome!
#JmackTheInstructor

David burdick is the ceo of acme bubblegum, a successful public company. as one of the cofounders of the company, burdick has enjoyed speaking and writing about the success of acme bubblegum for several years. typically, he speaks at conferences or directly to the press, but recently, he has been blogging about his firm anonymously. specifically, he defended a recent advertising campaign that was unpopular among consumers and pointedly attacked one of acme bubblegum’s competitors. burdick deeply enjoys his anonymous blogging and believes that none of his readers actually know that he works for acme bubblegum.should burdick be allowed to praise his company’s performance anonymously online? should he be allowed to attack his competitors without disclosing his relationship with the company? how would you feel if the ceo of a company at which you shopped was secretly writing criticisms of his or her competition? how would you feel if you knew a writer for your favorite blog was actually closely involved in a company that the blog discussed? 1. define the ethical issue? 2. who are the primary stakeholders? 3. what are the possible alternatives? 4. how could you evaluate the ethical implications of the alternative actions (use appropriate decision rules)? 5. what action would you recommend and why?