subject
Business, 21.01.2021 22:50 alexusjones6042

At December 31, DePaul Corporation had the following cumulative temporary differences associated with its operations: 1. Estimated warranty expense, $16 million temporary difference: expense recorded in the year of the sale; tax-deductible when paid (one-year warranty).
2. Depreciation expense, $120 million temporary difference: straight-line in the income statement; MACRS on the tax return.
3. Income from installment sales of properties, $20 million temporary difference: income recorded in the year of the sale; taxable when received equally over the next five years.
4. Rent revenue collected in advance, $24 million temporary difference; taxable in the year collected; recorded as income when the performance obligation is satisfied in the following year.

Required:
Assuming DePaul will show a single noncurrent net amount in its December 31 balance sheet, indicate that amount and whether it is a net deferred tax asset or liability. The tax rate is 25%.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 04:30
Your take on decision making process
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:50
In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 08:00
Compare the sources of consumer credit(there's not just one answer)1. consumers use a prearranged loan using special checks2. consumers use cards with no interest and non -revolving balances3. consumers pay off debt and credit is automatically renewed4. consumers take out a loan with a repayment date and have a specific purposea. travel and entertainment creditb. revolving check creditc. closed-end creditd. revolving credit
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 14:50
Pederson company reported the following: manufacturing costs $480,000 units manufactured 8,000 units sold 7,500 units sold for $90 per unit beginning inventory 2,000 units what is the average manufacturing cost per unit? (round the answer to the nearest dollar.)
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
At December 31, DePaul Corporation had the following cumulative temporary differences associated wit...
Questions
question
Advanced Placement (AP), 16.12.2021 20:00
question
Mathematics, 16.12.2021 20:00
question
Mathematics, 16.12.2021 20:00
question
Biology, 16.12.2021 20:00
Questions on the website: 13722367